Was just using that case as an example though, not saying all Italians do it.
No, he's absolutely right. How many games of his ban did Eduardo serve?
Wasn't referring to you man. I've just some really dire stuff regarding it though tbh.
Cheers mate. Yeah some bad stuff went around
Well, UEFA were satisfied that Arsenal had shown "conclusive evidence" which confirmed that Eduardo was touched. Of course if the same were to happen here I would withdraw my comments. But this looks a lot more clear cut, imho.
Sorry Jack, will try and make sure at least 70% of my posts herein are on topic.
Eduardo's looked pretty blatant too. Every Arsenal on the forum called it as an undeniable dive. I wonder why no one but UEFA has seen that angle.
That's the dumbest sentence you've ever typed. Couldn't guess which team you support IMO.
I think it was actually for a lack of evidence to show deception, not that necessarily there was contact - which there wasn't. Both Ngog and Eduardo had pretty disgraceful dives. And look, had they kept Eduardo's punishment I'd fully endorse Ngog getting it too. However, since they didn't, I see no equity in giving Ngog a suspension.
Now that I look at it again, you're right.
There seems to be some idea amongst governing bodies that a player can't possibly have dived if there's any contact with the defender, however minimal. Which is fetid horse smegma, obviously.
Just been charged with ABH on his sister sez the Beeb.
Irony not lost here.
