marc71178
Eyes not spreadsheets
So what has Joe Cole done wrong then?BoyBrumby said:I'd still take Becks as our wide right man; with Lampard at the head, Gerrard on the left & either King or Butt at the tail of a diamond.
So what has Joe Cole done wrong then?BoyBrumby said:I'd still take Becks as our wide right man; with Lampard at the head, Gerrard on the left & either King or Butt at the tail of a diamond.
Nothing, but would you play him ahead of the any of the holy trio?marc71178 said:So what has Joe Cole done wrong then?
You not a fan of midfielders who can tackle then? We need at least one & that means Cole as an impact player from the bench.marc71178 said:I'd play him in the midfield of him, Gerrard, Lampard and Beckham.
But cole is very effective on the left hand side, Gerrad isnt. therfore drop Gerrard if you want a holding midfealderBoyBrumby said:You not a fan of midfielders who can tackle then? We need at least one & that means Cole as an impact player from the bench.
That's why I suggested a diamond. Cole's role is more of a free role than traditional left-winger anyway. He doesn't really deliver any telling crosses from there, does he?Pothas said:But cole is very effective on the left hand side, Gerrad isnt. therfore drop Gerrard if you want a holding midfealder
How is he ahead of someone who plays that role for the same club he plays for?aussie said:But after seeing King work tonight i think playing him in that position over Carrick or whoever very seriously since he gave the mid-fielfd a very solid look.
i know but we looking at whats best for England. King looked very solid, I haven't seen much of Carrick playing for England but i dunno if he has ever played the holding role as well has Kingy did tonight, so for England's sake King should do it...marc71178 said:How is he ahead of someone who plays that role for the same club he plays for?
Does that make sense to anybody else? It certainly doesn't too me. King won't play that role for Tottenham. Carrick will and he does a good job there also which is why he plays there. King is good in defence which is why he plays there. No sense risking kIng there whne Carrick is much more experienced and less likely to foul up.aussie said:i know but we looking at whats best for England. King looked very solid, I haven't seen much of Carrick playing for England but i dunno if he has ever played the holding role as well has Kingy did tonight, so for England's sake King should do it...
King didn't play it well though - he just blocked things then didn't know what to do with the ball.aussie said:i know but we looking at whats best for England. King looked very solid, I haven't seen much of Carrick playing for England but i dunno if he has ever played the holding role as well has Kingy did tonight, so for England's sake King should do it...
Richardson and Downing?Scaly piscine said:I haven't changed my views on the left-side of midfield. Need a genuine left midfield player there like Richardson, Downing etc. Joe Cole fluffed all the crosses he attempted with his left foot and his cutting inside simply makes it easier for the defenders.
Exactly - King may be able to tackle well, but he's never going to create anything. Carrick is one of the Premiership's most creative players on his day, and if he was picked in the holding role for England we could see him performing a role similar to that of Andrea Pirlo for Italy - the deep-lying playmaker, who sits back allowing the others to attack but also starts attacks himself, becoming the focal point of forward play, feeding the ball to others in more dangerous positions with pinpoint accuracy.marc71178 said:King didn't play it well though - he just blocked things then didn't know what to do with the ball.
Carrick has ability on the ball, a key factor for a midfielder.
TBF (and defending Tw@ttenham players doesn't come naturally to me) King wasn't selected for his creativity. His job was to win the ball & lay it off to someone who is creative, which I thought he did admirably. Chelsea have just spent £24m (IIRC?) on a player who does just that (Essien). In terms of creativity he makes Makalele look like Maradona!Barney Rubble said:Exactly - King may be able to tackle well, but he's never going to create anything. Carrick is one of the Premiership's most creative players on his day, and if he was picked in the holding role for England we could see him performing a role similar to that of Andrea Pirlo for Italy - the deep-lying playmaker, who sits back allowing the others to attack but also starts attacks himself, becoming the focal point of forward play, feeding the ball to others in more dangerous positions with pinpoint accuracy.
I rate myself as a better option than Hargreaves. And I'm a right back.BoyBrumby said:TBF (and defending Tw@ttenham players doesn't come naturally to me) King wasn't selected for his creativity. His job was to win the ball & lay it off to someone who is creative, which I thought he did admirably. Chelsea have just spent £24m (IIRC?) on a player who does just that (Essien). In terms of creativity he makes Makalele look like Maradona!
I would have a look at Carrick, I rate him as a far better option than Hargreaves. I suspect most people who watch football do, with the possible exception of the one bloke who matters.
He's not a left-back either though, he's just fitting in there at the moment for United IIRC.marc71178 said:For a start, Richardson isn't a left midfielder, he's just left footed.
If you go by where he played at West Brom, he's a central midfielder, and it's not like we need any more of them!PY said:He's not a left-back either though, he's just fitting in there at the moment for United IIRC.