superkingdave
Hall of Fame Member
As i say that Hodge is out, damn, 65 not bad on debut shame he couldn't get a ton.
I've done the ruling-out on the grounds that they're all too experienced, surely?marc71178 said:I don't think it'll be Coke this time - my money is on it being a bit of dope (apparently it remains in the system a long time, not that I'd know that of course).
I also don't think Neil was correct to rule some of those out that he did.
Smacks of hypocricy:Neil Pickup said:Tending towards Warren at the moment as he hasn't played since - but you never know.
Which is why I mentioned all eleven names from the Warwickshire side and probability hasn't been based upon character "flaws", merely length of career, experience and selections.a massive zebra said:
Yea it's like the numerous occasions in the 90s when certain players against England were shown picking away, damaging the ball and absolutely nothing happened. Of course once Atherton had a pocketful of dirt...SpaceMonkey said:On another note, im not sure if it was mentioned but Surrey got docked a WHOLE 5 runs for ball tampering in their latest game.
What exactly is the point? ooo a whole 5 runs for blatent cheating. When the outcome could be a number of wickets for the cheating team. It just doesnt make sense. ECB really need to pull their finger out.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/counties/4525393.stm
The one I have in mind hasn't played since, and has been in this sort of situation before.Neil Pickup said:I've done the ruling-out on the grounds that they're all too experienced, surely?
That was who I thought initially, but didn't want to name names for obvious reasons.badgerhair said:
More'n a bit...The Baconator said:He was done for drugs about 10-ish years ago wasn't he? Bit stupid of him to get done again if it is him.