Scaly piscine
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Durham should get negative points for the nature of that defeat to Surrey, utterly pathetic.
It's been abandoned alltogther now - four points each. I think thats what happens when you put money before cricket - Worcs moved the 20/20 games because it would cost them money if they weren't played but they kept this match here because they would lose money if the televised pro 40 game on Friday doesn't go ahead. Funny set of priorities - they are stuck to the foot of the table and will be further behind now Surrey have won so you'd have thought they would want to play. Would you put any money on the Friday game going ahead either?3 days abandoned at New Road now - I'm going to be interested to see how the ECB handle this one and to see what, if any, compensation is given to Kent.
Well, I'm happyDurham should get negative points for the nature of that defeat to Surrey, utterly pathetic.
2 up and down. I think last season was when it went to 2 up and down.Well, I'm happy
It looks like a seriously good effort by Clarke, which we don't get to say very often, coming in at 50 for 4 and scoring the winning 70 at about 5-an-over. And what a welcome change to see an Oval wicket that isn't a complete road.
btw is it 2 up & down this year or is it still 3?
He's a yorkie.Not sure why you'd want that...considering he's the captain of the test team and a good batsmen.
I was at the game on day one and just speaking to a couple of guys the wicket was at least a 300 plus (first innings strip). With most of the wickets falling owing more to a 20/20 hangover than good bowler, really was some reckless cricket from both sides. Weather did not help batting (picture below) but Durham really should be disappointed to get rolled out so easily at The Oval, especially with the fact that most of the damage was done by a seam attack which is usually a one man band. Good result nevertheless.Well, I'm happy
It looks like a seriously good effort by Clarke, which we don't get to say very often, coming in at 50 for 4 and scoring the winning 70 at about 5-an-over. And what a welcome change to see an Oval wicket that isn't a complete road.
Graham Ford wants Worcestershire to be punished and I can understand why, Kent have been given a raw deal.3 days abandoned at New Road now - I'm going to be interested to see how the ECB handle this one and to see what, if any, compensation is given to Kent.
Yeah Anderson bowled well but it was a pretty poor knock from Captain Vaughan. Scratched around all innings and his dismissal was a tad embarrassing.Anderson's bowling gun. Just need him to hit Vaughan.
Awesome picture.I was at the game on day one and just speaking to a couple of guys the wicket was at least a 300 plus (first innings strip). With most of the wickets falling owing more to a 20/20 hangover than good bowler, really was some reckless cricket from both sides. Weather did not help batting (picture below) but Durham really should be disappointed to get rolled out so easily at The Oval, especially with the fact that most of the damage was done by a seam attack which is usually a one man band. Good result nevertheless.
Lets not go there Poor show by Worcestershire even tho it pains me to say it. They should have moved the game to Kidderminster like they did some of the 20/20 games.What's the deal with the Worcester situation? I haven't been following it
Worcestershire decided to go ahead and host their championship game against Kent at New Road, so that they could play their Pro 40 game on Friday and receive TV revenue to help them make up some of the financial loss they sustained when New Road was flooded a couple of weeks ago.What's the deal with the Worcester situation? I haven't been following it