tooextracool
International Coach
even i have a better chance than ealhamtwctopcat said:Always a chance of a recall for Ealham though!
even i have a better chance than ealhamtwctopcat said:Always a chance of a recall for Ealham though!
Looks like Nasser's going to have to stay on just a little longer, thenchris.hinton said:Kadeer Failed again
Worcester where 146 all out
and Lancashire are going along well 30/0 at lunch
What are Kadeer Ali's stats looking like right now???luckyeddie said:Looks like Nasser's going to have to stay on just a little longer, then
I think it's pushing 19 now.Langeveldt said:What are Kadeer Ali's stats looking like right now???
I thought it was something like a FC average of 16 odd in about 30 innings.... And he is a specialist bat...
He must think every day is Christmas
How flat is the wicket. Maybe I would fancy myself for a 30 or 40 odd?Neil Pickup said:If I were a Surrey fan, I'd be looking for a rope and a tree.
Warwickshire 493-6
Brad Hogg 156* (160b, 19x4, 1x6)
Ashley Giles 60* (116b, 4x4)
They've added 187 in 156 minutes for the seventh wicket!
He's a young fast bowler whos only in his 2nd full season, and he wasnt a 1st team regular last season. I think its very wise for Lancashire to rest him, at least for the game when they have Anderson avaliable to replace him.tooextracool said:howcome sajid mahmood isnt playing for lancashire?
chris.hinton said:Worcester have done well apart from batting
Well seeing as the Warwickshire "dream" spin pairing of Mark Wagh and Jim Troughton (neither of whom are any great performers with the ball) shared 39 overs for 69 runs - I imagine it's the Surrey bowlers who didn't do their job!Craig said:How flat is the wicket. Maybe I would fancy myself for a 30 or 40 odd?
That's nothing, Jim Troughton (see post above this one) took 3-1 against one of the UCCEs!a massive zebra said:James Kirtley has figures of 7-6-1-3 against a University Center for Cricketing Excellence.