This is what Northamptonshire said on the matter....a massive zebra said:If the courts would have had to allow him to play, then why did Northamptonshire not pursue the legal action? Phil Jaques would be the backbone of an otherwise unconvincing batting lineup. Money should not be a problem because if Northamptonshire won their case the ECB would have had to pay their costs.
"But Northants have decided not to pursue the matter following talks with the England and Wales Cricket Board.
A club statement read: "After considerable thought and consultation, the committee fully support the need for regulations which focus on the development of cricketers who are committed and qualified to play for England.
"In view of the above, the application to register Phil, as a result of holding a British passport, has been withdrawn."
Jaques could qualify to play for England in three years if he spends the majority of each year in the UK, but he told BBC Sport last September that he wanted to give himself every chance of playing for Australia."
To be honest though why don't they just get him as a Overseas player, as he must be better than their current 2nd overseas player (Johann Louw), who I can say I have never heard of at all - Lang' might be able to fill us in a bit though
Talking of Overseas players Kent have announced they are on the hunt again after Symonds broke into the Australian Test team, if he is continued to be picked and what with his One Day spot as well he could miss the entire season.... So where is your money who are we looking at?
Last edited: