Bradman did have a spell of poor form. Have a look at his performances in the first few matches of the 1934 Ashes tour.Swervy said:all batsmen (apart from Bradman) go through spells where things dont quite click
Perhaps you should read what I say before accusing me of such nonsense:tooextracool said:oh so let me get this straight here...u are comparing an in form sarwan to an out of form michael vaughan(he was throughout the summer)??why do u look at the last 15 tests then??look at their entire careers both have played nearly the same no of test matches and vaughan averages nearly 10 more than sarwan.
and also have u been looking at the kind of wickets the 2 have been batting on?sarwan gets to bat on those lifeless wickets in the west indies while vaughan has had to bat in england and sri lanka, two very different stories i must say
and despite all of that vaughan still averages 4 more than sarwan in that period..out of form and all....tsk tsk
Lol.tooextracool said:anti harmison fans
The duck's back!!!luckyeddie said:Fact.... Steve Harmison was a joke a year ago, and much of the criticism was warranted.
Fact.... Steve Harmison has progressed so far in 12 months that he bears little resemblance to what we saw before.
Fact.... Rik will now take those statements and proclaim that I reckon Steve Harmison is now beyond a joke.
It's why Dwayne Smith isn't up to Test standard yet.Tim said:Ridiculous batting...either his partner should have come down the wicket & told him, or even if he saw the plan going into effect he should have known better.
Smith's was a planned trap at his inadequacies; Sarwan's was a waft it seems.Tim said:Im not watching the match on tv, but from cricinfo commentary it seems the last 2 wickets have been fairly poor dismissals.