Sanz
Hall of Fame Member
Yup I want WI to WIN. Two more wickets please.Swervy said:Clarke out...Freddie in....one more quick wicket and this is back in the balance.
Yup I want WI to WIN. Two more wickets please.Swervy said:Clarke out...Freddie in....one more quick wicket and this is back in the balance.
Sanz said:Yup I want WI to WIN. Two more wickets please.
Sucks as much as Gough and Harmison I guess. None of those bowlers did very well on these flat pitches. Dillon really only had one shocker of a game. Other than that he was quite solid. Also, no one ever claimed Dillon to be dependable.twctopcat said:More to the point, how long until dillon goes, this guy sucks. Supposed to be dependable, my ****.
He has been their best bowler post Ambrose/Walsh without doubt...twctopcat said:More to the point, how long until dillon goes, this guy sucks. Supposed to be dependable, my ****.
In terms of wickets u mean.The WI have better bowlers than Dillon but some of them weren't given enough opportunities or got injured when they did.He has been their best bowler post Ambrose/Walsh without doubt...
Dependable? Yes... But maybe he is doing a bit of a Gough..
tooextracool said:have to wonder why clarke bowled 7 overs despite getting hammered.
You would pick Scotland wouldnt you?Loony BoB said:Ace, thanks mate. When CricInfo says a match will start at 13:35GMT, does that mean that's when the players will be on the field, or does it mean something more like flipping the coin? Or does DST have something to do with it? When I'm at work I can't check this stuff any other way, so it'd be nice to know. Thanks again, though. Finishing work early today so I'm off... into the wet rain for an hour on a bus until I finally sit down on my couch. I love Britain, I really do.
Fair enough, but when Gough gets hit about so do the rest of the England attack. You've got to wonder a bit though when relative newcomers like Rampaul perform better than him.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Sucks as much as Gough and Harmison I guess. None of those bowlers did very well on these flat pitches. Dillon really only had one shocker of a game. Other than that he was quite solid. Also, no one ever claimed Dillon to be dependable.
i was talking about test matches there....hes a good ODI player thoughLoony BoB said:I love how you say that the Windies "persist" with someone who is rated as the best all rounder in the world at the ODI level, not to mention 4th on the batting scales (or was recently). And you didn't even give him a touch of credit for being arguably the best bowler of the Windies pack in more than one of the ODI's.
Don't be too disappointed. Trust that you will see Corey Collymore play international cricket again. Also, how can he be the luckiest player in this series? I await you explanation keenly. This should be good.tooextracool said:collymore - one bad over and we might never see him in international cricket again.he certainly hasnt been the luckiest player in this series has he? 2/10