Mr Casson
Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah, I was picking Fred for it though.Scaly piscine said:Was only a matter of time before someone was 'out' off a no-ball...
Yeah, I was picking Fred for it though.Scaly piscine said:Was only a matter of time before someone was 'out' off a no-ball...
Ok, that makes sense then. Terrible over rate as usual.Scaly piscine said:Didn't they start half an hour early?
The only reason Harmison should rest is if the calf injury is serious.Other than that he needs to bowl to try and remember how he used to do it i.e fuller and straighter. The rest will take care of itself.marc71178 said:Whatever happens, he has to play against Bangladesh to hopefully get some confidence going - he's very much a confidence bowler, and it appears that it's noticeable that his head dropped and his bowling fell apart when Trescothick dropped that catch.
I believe Ntini would have smashed all the English bowlers to bits, and taken South Africa home with an over to spare.tooextracool said:well considering that england would quite likely have won had it not been for bad light in durban, i dont see how that really matters anymore.
I'm beginning to worry about you. You may actually be gifted (or cursed, depending on the situation).twctopcat said:All england fans can thank me. Wrote this kiss of death post on purpose. Worked like a dream.
It made me laugh that Bannister (worst commentator ever) was moaning about how England's no balls had been terrible and betrayed a lack of discipline.Hoggy31 said:Hah! wicket of a no-ball and now there going off for bad light 9 down.
The mind is a powerful tool, and i am proof to that. Do not be worried (unless you support someone other than England, in which case you are screwed).Jono said:I'm beginning to worry about you. You may actually be gifted (or cursed, depending on the situation).
Why? When we collapsed 1st innings at Durban, most of the comments I read were about poor English batting rather than the pitch.Pratyush said:Yes it has been a very good cricket wicket with some thing for both the bowlers and the batsmen.
But would the English say the same had they batted first and collapsed? I have my apprehensions.
Doubtless Smith will say he was shoring up the middle-order, but I put it down to funk.marc71178 said:The speculation about him coming in at 5 is because he wanted to get away from Hoggard and the new ball.
Clearly he has no flaws and is the best since Bradman...
Because some people were apprehensive about an English collapse because of the pitch even before the match started.wpdavid said:Why? When we collapsed 1st innings at Durban, most of the comments I read were about poor English batting rather than the pitch.
The most important aspect is the pitch obviously but bowlers do tend to bowl from the end where the umpire is more likely to give out for a certain bowler too on ocassions. I am surprised you dont know that.marc71178 said:As shown by Hoggard today.
After the 7fer on Monday (gained mainly at Dar's end) he bowled from Bucknor's end.
Bowlers choose the end that suits their bowling.
Pathetic as your attempts at mocking me usually are.marc71178 said:[Pratyush mode] I can't see how that was given as it is clear the bail hasn't been removed - poor umpiring again. [/Pratyush mode]
I wonder if you can actually bring some insight in posts rather than wondering about reasons behind my posts.marc71178 said:And he was definite, and he was right.
I wonder if your moaning is more because you're about 4 days from having a lot of your earlier posts brought up to make you look wrong.
Prove when I said England will not be able to win a game. Else shut up.marc71178 said:All his comments about England not being able to win a game let alone the series.
The first part of your name says it allPratyush said:Prove when I said England will not be able to win a game. Else shut up.