SpaceMonkey
International Debutant
Normally yes but ive had these visions where England lose the toss and get bowled out for 50 on the greenist wicket ever produced!Mr Mxyzptlk said:Boo. That's not good for cricket. Beat 'em properly.
Normally yes but ive had these visions where England lose the toss and get bowled out for 50 on the greenist wicket ever produced!Mr Mxyzptlk said:Boo. That's not good for cricket. Beat 'em properly.
Leave Ralph Nader out of thisSpaceMonkey said:Normally yes but ive had these visions where England lose the toss and get bowled out for 50 on the greenist wicket ever produced!
well considering that england would quite likely have won had it not been for bad light in durban, i dont see how that really matters anymore.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Boo. That's not good for cricket. Beat 'em properly.
Well there's a Harmison playing in Bangalore, dunno if there'll be one playing at Centurion tomorrow. There are a few theories out there on who England will pick.SpeedKing said:i personally would like to see the weather improving because i want to see the harmison that we saw last summer bowling then i will ave some hope for next summer
It doesn't have to be by aggregate; most correct decisions on average would suffice.tooextracool said:conversely someone like shephard who is really experienced might have made more correct decisions than anyone else ATM, yet he might have made many many wrong decisions too, far more than say an inexperienced umpire. the best way to look at it then is to take a ratio between the number of right and wrong decisions.
Oh, you're one of those "Glass is half-empty" types like Langeveldt, are you?tooextracool said:or for that matter the least wrong decisions on average.