• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** England in South Africa 2015/16

Captain_Cook

U19 12th Man
And with a tournament approaching rapidly on the horizon, England shed their limited overs form just in time for matches that actually matter...
 

Compton

International Debutant
I think if he got a hattrick Tahir would just implode. I don't think he could handle how chuffed he would be with himself.
 

Burner

International Regular
Jeez, guys. It's a t20. How many sides not have a game like this every once in a while in t20s?!
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
People reacting like there is some magic way to bat that will have England win every game without fail is something I'll never get.

When they bat too slowly - bad strategy
When they lose wickets - bad strategy
When yog-sothoth devours spectators - bad strategy

They've won 7 matches in a row going into this.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
People reacting like there is some magic way to bat that will have England win every game without fail is something I'll never get.

When they bat too slowly - bad strategy
When they lose wickets - bad strategy
When yog-sothoth devours spectators - bad strategy

They've won 7 matches in a row going into this.
Fair comment, and I'd have to admit that the 7 in a row in this format had slipped through my radar.
Obviously one or two of us are just looking at out last three innings in any limited overs format and wondering how many few overs we could expect our boys to bat out the lot.
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
People reacting like there is some magic way to bat that will have England win every game without fail is something I'll never get.

When they bat too slowly - bad strategy
When they lose wickets - bad strategy
When yog-sothoth devours spectators - bad strategy

They've won 7 matches in a row going into this.
Slightly different make-up of team though wasn't it, by memory? One more batsman.

Edit perhaps not, I'm only annoyed because of having the douchery of tahir to put up with 4 times, and obviously this bringing up the never-ending KP bp;;ox again.
 
Last edited:

Howe_zat

Audio File
Not enough. Need to give credit to SA who bowled and caught exceptionally well to keep Buttler quiet as well as pick up wickets throughout.

Think we need to face that Stokes and Moeen in the middle order is a real problem in limited overs, don't think we can ignore that when Billings is availabe.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Think we need to face that Stokes and Moeen in the middle order is a real problem in limited overs, don't think we can ignore that when Billings is availabe.
Would you straight up drop one of them? I'm not sure the bowling strong enough to really get away with Root being the sixth option.

Dropping Roy for Billings and opening with Moeen avoids that conundrum to an extent I suppose.
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Would you straight up drop one of them? I'm not sure the bowling strong enough to really get away with Root being the sixth option.

Dropping Roy for Billings and opening with Moeen avoids that conundrum to an extent I suppose.
In 50 over I'd do just that, but I think Roy's ability to get us off to a fast start in T20 is something that's hard to overlook. Just not sure what we do, shame they don't trust Willey up the order.
 

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Not enough. Need to give credit to SA who bowled and caught exceptionally well to keep Buttler quiet as well as pick up wickets throughout.

Think we need to face that Stokes and Moeen in the middle order is a real problem in limited overs, don't think we can ignore that when Billings is availabe.
Would you straight up drop one of them? I'm not sure the bowling strong enough to really get away with Root being the sixth option.

Dropping Roy for Billings and opening with Moeen avoids that conundrum to an extent I suppose.
I think Eng should open with Root, classy player that can beat the inner ring without trying to hard... and probably hold the innings together to let all the others play with freedom. I think the problem with Stokes is that he is not playing with freedom, he is coming in at 5 having to keep the innings going but nervous to lose his wicket. I would swap Butler and Stokes. Butler can easily play both roles of going after an attack or taking singles... (take this as a SA supporter that's no expert on the English team)
 
Last edited:

Furball

Evil Scotsman
I think it's a few factors. This is a big one, but I'd also argue that spinners tend to bowl at easier times in T20 cricket, and (probably most crucially) there are also a disproportionate amount of T20Is played in Asia and the West Indies where spin is a bigger factor.

In the last five years, percentage of matches including at one Test playing nation played in Asia/WI:

T20Is: 62.44%
ODIs: 48.66%
Tests: 48.57%
West Indies, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh have all hosted the World T20 in that timeframe as well.
 

Top