2 runs off, dang. I was close!dontcloseyoureyes said:England to lose by 11, any takers?
It could also be argued that England should never have let it come to this chasing just 211.Jono said:Just as I post that, he edges it to Younis Kahn who takes a fantastic catch. Good fight back from England, but really Pakistan should have never let it get that close.
Not bad at all, considering the fact that the man of the match awards have all been something like $1000, in both Tests and ODIs.Beleg said:2 lakh rupee = 1900 pound sterling.
Yeah and then you could say Pakistan should never have only posted 210 and lose 3 wickets for no runs etc. etc.Steulen said:It could also be argued that England should never have let it come to this chasing just 211.
But that's what you get when you're a mediocre ODI side like England.
A bit of both, really. Tres shouldn't be excepted - he's been pathetic since his big innings in the first Test, and continues to be.BoyBrumby said:I haven't seen any of our innings yet (oh to be rich & idle! ) but it looks like a pretty gutless effort from our top order (Freddie &, to lesser extent, Tres excepted).
Or was it just inspired bowling?
Was going solely by his score today. 23 not great from an opener at all, but more than Prior, Strauss, Solanki & Collingwood managed between them.ClownSymonds said:A bit of both, really. Tres shouldn't be excepted - he's been pathetic since his big innings in the first Test, and continues to be.
I think we can safely say that's not going to happen. Seeing as even when he bowls well and the track is helpful he still ends up with 2-51.pakster said:Gem of an innings from Kabir, bowled well too - He should be a permanent member of Englands ODI team..
What does having to pre-qualify for the CT actually entail? Is it a series of games against Namibia/Bangladesh/USA/Outer Mongolia or is it something slightly more challenging? If it's the former, I say bring it on.BoyBrumby said:Was going solely by his score today. 23 not great from an opener at all, but more than Prior, Strauss, Solanki & Collingwood managed between them.
Looks like we're doomed to have to pre-qualify for the Champions Trophy.
Pretty much, although the up-and-coming Outer Mongolians have been rather unjustly overlooked.Barney Rubble said:What does having to pre-qualify for the CT actually entail? Is it a series of games against Namibia/Bangladesh/USA/Outer Mongolia or is it something slightly more challenging? If it's the former, I say bring it on.
Behind the times, are we? The Outer Mongolians have been given a last chance by the ICC - Genghis Khan's body will be sent to a deathmatch (literally) with Eirik Bloodaxe and Peter Chingoka for one spot in the Champions' Trophy.BoyBrumby said:Pretty much, although the up-and-coming Outer Mongolians have been rather unjustly overlooked.
Actually, I've just heard from someone else (not involved with this board) that it involves more than just four teams - they suggested it involved Kenya, USA, Canada and Holland, too. They didn't sound too sure though. Anyone know exactly?BoyBrumby said:Pretty much, although the up-and-coming Outer Mongolians have been rather unjustly overlooked.
I think the top 6 ranked teams come next March qualify for the tournament proper (two groups of 4 this time), with 7-10 playing off in a round robin for last two. So, as it stands it'll be us, Windies, Zimbas & Banglas playing off.