I am not.I didn't realise you were a girl
So the next time you come on strong to Shabbir, it's ok for us to say Get a womb, you two?Beleg said:I am not.
But I hear they are producing those nifty artificial wombs these days...
He impressed me a great deal the last time he skippered as well.social said:Must say that Ive been pretty impressed with Tresco's captaincy.
I don't know, I just don't rate Gayle that much. There isn't that much, in my eyes, dividing Sehwag and Gayle on ODI's. Apart from Gayle's ability to bowl a little better than Sehwag, and Sehwag's tendency to try too hard [even though, at times, Gayle is guilty of this.] for me, it should've been Trescothick and Sehwag, but what does it matter anyway. Futile.Jono said:Who would have been your two ODI openers for the Rest Of The World?
See I can see what you're saying in regards to dropping someone for Treschothick. Where I disagree is who you are dropping. Gayle is a better ODI player than Sehwag nowadays. He's better than Afridi too, and Sangakkara has only recently been made into a ODI opener. So why drop Gayle? Drop Sehwag.
So this is totaly ignoring Gayle's ability to average almost 40 in ODIs whilst not trying hard enough? However you look at it 40 will always be > 30.dontcloseyoureyes said:I don't know, I just don't rate Gayle that much. There isn't that much, in my eyes, dividing Sehwag and Gayle on ODI's. Apart from Gayle's ability to bowl a little better than Sehwag, and Sehwag's tendency to try too hard [even though, at times, Gayle is guilty of this.] for me, it should've been Trescothick and Sehwag, but what does it matter anyway. Futile.
You're new, I can tell ( )dontcloseyoureyes said:Yeah, honestly, if I had to pick out of the two to bat for me I'd pick Sehwag so accept opinion is a wonderful thing and move on.
Know what one you mean, but can't see how you thought it hit him in line. It hit on the back pad, which was outside the line (front pad wasn't).social said:Off-spinner (Malik, I ,think)
Hit him middle and off, going on to hit middle. Playing a sweep at the time. Looked plumb with the naked eye and worse with the aid of technology.
Umpiring has been really, reall bad.
luckyeddie said:Cricinfo strikes:
34.6 Flintoff to Younis Khan, OUT: Gone, what a waist of a wicket
I agree. He should have belted it. Showed no stomach for a fight - he'll be gutted.
Jealousy is a wonderful thing, isn't it Rich......Langeveldt said:Good to see that tool Pietersen falling cheaply, for a change..
The proper name for this is a night-watchmanShahid Afridi said:nice to see pakistan are using an england tactic by using a bowler to bat in an earliar order (hoggard).
we really need afridi