He's probably not hitting enough sixes for Arjun.Jono said:Yeah yeah I know, I was just asking in general Sanz, as in putting the question to people in this thread. I knew you weren't having a go at Dravid, how can anyone have a go at him?
I disagree. If this test ends in a draw, India should feel equally good especially after what happened on Day 4.Pratyush said:Despite England having played well in the test, a draw is very much as good as a victory for them despite the possibility of the win they had at the end of day 4.
Vow, you are pretty easy to work out.Sanz said:How did Ganguly come into this discussion ??
Btw I was not laughing @ Dravid's strike rate but at the frustration English bowlers must have been going through when bowling to the wall. Please read my posts on Dravid in this thread before making stupid assumptions.
LOL true, true, as much as I like Jones he can be very frustrating, he seems to have greater difficulty with easier chancesmarc71178 said:Which they in turn could thank Geraint for...
It's Sunday...Sanz said:Thank God its a saturday and I dont have to goto work tomorrow..Yeah and thank god there is cricketweb.
I will put it ths way -Sanz said:I disagree. If this test ends in a draw, India should feel equally good especially after what happened on Day 4.
but at the start of the test, I think it was widely considered India would easily win this one.Sanz said:I disagree. If this test ends in a draw, India should feel equally good especially after what happened on Day 4.
No India didn't have Yuvraj to pick from. Pitch didn't wear because of the heavy rain on the night of day 2 which (believe or not) helped Hoggy immensly(not taking any credit away from him though) on day 3 morning. If Jones was going to play there is good chance that Hoggard would have been carrying drinks.Pratyush said:I will put it ths way -
England and India bought showed admirable fighting qualities in the match.
The pitch had a role to play in the draw considering it didn't wear as much, had slow turn, no great zip off the surface but it did give some thing to the bowlers who kept at it so it wasn't pathetic.
England had 40% of their A bowling line up missing (apart from batsmen who were made up for), India had every one to chose from. So I would say England has a lot more to be proud of than India given the circumstances.
Jaffer has already scored more than Cook, if he scores a century and India draws this one then him else Collingwood.adharcric said:Who would you choose as MOM?
Paul Collingwood (134* and 36*)
Alistair Cook (60 and 104*)
Matthew Hoggard (6-57 & the lone wicket in the 2nd innings)
Wasim Jaffer (81 and 84+*, still going strong)
yeah but he didnt get a century and collingwood's was just as good but biggerPratyush said:Why not Md. Kaif. Boy that was a superb inning under pressure from him.
It was there mostly in the minds of English fans, I never thought for a second that India was going to have it easy( win or draw) despite the absence of Tresco and Vaughan.Swervy said:but at the start of the test, I think it was widely considered India would easily win this one.
England definatly come out of this test with more credit