Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Why exactly did Pietersen bat at #4 with Collingwood in the side? Pietersen is definitely a #5 as far as I'm concerned, and Collingwood has performed fairly well at #4 in his career so far.
He'll have to go some with only the bowlers as company, but all credit to him for showing more intelligence than most of the others put together.Scaly piscine said:I do hope Collingwood gets his ton tomorrow and I hope certain people have noticed that his average is better than Bell's when you remove the Bangladesh freebies.
social said:What is it about Pathan?
He must be the most overrated bowler around these days.
Nope.CDAK said:Any change now?
Says something about this English batting line-up though, if they fall flat to a quicky on debut with some poor FC and an overrated slow pace bowler such as Pathan.steds said:Nope.
What did he do?steds said:Blackwell = idiot.
Ah. And with only a couple of runs to his name, and about an over to go?Jono said:(re Blackwell)Tried to cut a short wide ball, didn't move his feet at all, and chopped on to his stumps.
whoever said he didnt have the mentality (or ability) to play tests ? .......yes anywayAh. And with only a couple of runs to his name, and about an over to go?
Yup, "idiot" sounds about right
hes there to do the thorpe job, hes in that position to come in and put in a solid display and sure up the innings in case the top order fail, exactly as has happened today.Prince EWS said:Why exactly did Pietersen bat at #4 with Collingwood in the side? Pietersen is definitely a #5 as far as I'm concerned, and Collingwood has performed fairly well at #4 in his career so far.