yeah perhaps it would make a difference, but cricket is so circumstantial you can't really make assessments in hindsight about what difference a certain player would have made. england have been well-served by the replacements cook and collingwood, so the absence of tresco and vaughan hasnt been felt as much. brilliant bowling by hoggard, jones would've been a handful i reckon.aussie said:Trescothick has been england's best batsman on the sub-continent for a long time, so i reckon he could have done better than Cook while Vaughan has been out of sorts of late so maybe if he had played over Collingwood he wont have scored all those runs. But add Jones & Gilo to the bowling attack making it full strenght, to me judging on this 1st innings may have been enough to cause India's batsmen enough problems.
LMAO! Conveniently ripped that out with India 7 down.aussie said:india are lucky england aren't full strenght, then i'd be seriously backing england to win this series.
Sounds about right. No-one could argue that T&V would have definitely made more than the 194 contributed by C&C. Jones has been missed, of course, but that's increasingly looking the way it's going to be, so we'd better get used to it.adharcric said:yeah perhaps it would make a difference, but cricket is so circumstantial you can't really make assessments in hindsight about what difference a certain player would have made. england have been well-served by the replacements cook and collingwood, so the absence of tresco and vaughan hasnt been felt as much. brilliant bowling by hoggard, jones would've been a handful i reckon.
Yeah because he went out playing a stupid shot didn't he? No he got an absolute gem of a ball on his first delivery he was facing. I'd hardly blame him for that. Hell, at least he didn't get bowled.adharcric said:the glamorous indian middle-order legends should learn from kaif right now (laxman, are you hearing me)
Well said Jono.Jono said:Yeah because he went out playing a stupid shot didn't he? No he got an absolute gem of a ball on his first delivery he was facing. I'd hardly blame him for that. Hell, at least he didn't get bowled.
He's only bowled 4 overs, give him a chance. Apparently he was being primed to come on before tea but it was taken early. With the way the Kaif-Kumble partnership is going, I think it's only a matter of time before Blackie's brought on.adharcric said:seriously, why is blackwell even in india. he's done absolutely NOTHING.
It looks like Flintoff agrees with you - he's brought on Panesar ahead of Harmison with the new ball only a handful of overs oldAnna said:Anyway, Harmison's bowling like a drain.....I see no-one getting on his back.
What do you think Kaif would have done to the delivery that got Laxman ?adharcric said:(laxman, are you hearing me)
This post should be after yours Anna.PY said:First up....rank long hop.