• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** England in India 2016/17

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
England 1st innings sweepstakes

Zinzan - 225
harsh - 235
Shri - 245
Teja - 263
***** - 300
OS - 310
Dan Bali - 333
 

91Jmay

International Coach
They lost to Bangladesh... that's not a bad series, that's a "Holy ****, that's the first side in the Top 6 to ever lose a test, let alone series to Bangladesh"
Bangladesh will beat most teams in Test match at home, if they aren't too chicken **** to tour
 

Contra

Cricketer Of The Year
England 1st innings sweepstakes

harsh - 235
Shri - 245
Teja - 263
***** - 300
OS - 310
Dan Bali - 333
Zinzan - 225
Contra - 256
 

Blocky

Banned
Bangladesh would hammer NZ and Aus on those tracks.
Losing to India in India is one thing, losing to Bangladesh requires you to pick players like Gareth Batty and think he's honestly going to make a difference.. NZ also drew the series in UAE against Pakistan when they still had Ajmal, and drew the last series in Sri Lanka when Sri Lanka were still a force.

England got caught out by bad selection tendencies against a side that shouldn't beat anyone in their position.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Losing to India in India is one thing, losing to Bangladesh requires you to pick players like Gareth Batty and think he's honestly going to make a difference.. NZ also drew the series in UAE against Pakistan when they still had Ajmal, and drew the last series in Sri Lanka when Sri Lanka were still a force.

England got caught out by bad selection tendencies against a side that shouldn't beat anyone in their position.
We won the test that Batty played so you are making a bigger fool of yourself than usual. That is some effort.
 

Blocky

Banned
Bangladesh will beat most teams in Test match at home, if they aren't too chicken **** to tour
That's pretty rich though; England hasn't exactly been touring Bangladesh or letting them tour frequently when compared to sides like NZ.

We won the test that Batty played so you are making a bigger fool of yourself than usual. That is some effort.
That doesn't change the fact that he should never be selected for England, nor should half the guys that contributed to losing a test there. You should also keep in mind that England scraped the first test by 22 runs and should really have lost it.
 
Last edited:

AndyZaltzHair

Hall of Fame Member
England 1st innings sweepstakes

harsh - 235
Shri - 245
Teja - 263
***** - 300
OS - 310
Dan Bali - 333
Zinzan - 225
Contra - 256
Howe - 281
AZH - 401
 

91Jmay

International Coach
That's pretty rich though; England hasn't exactly been touring Bangladesh or letting them tour frequently when compared to sides like NZ.



That doesn't change the fact that he should never be selected for England, nor should half the guys that contributed to losing the series there.
I'd regard losing to Bangladesh at home same as losing to West Indies or Sri Lanka. You need to watch more cricket not involving New Zealand bud
 

Blocky

Banned
I'd regard losing to Bangladesh at home same as losing to West Indies or Sri Lanka. You need to watch more cricket not involving New Zealand bud
No one loses to West Indies, away or home.
No one loses to Bangladesh, away or home.
Sri Lanka at home with Herath are still a tough side.
 

91Jmay

International Coach
That's pretty rich though; England hasn't exactly been touring Bangladesh or letting them tour frequently when compared to sides like NZ.



That doesn't change the fact that he should never be selected for England, nor should half the guys that contributed to losing a test there. You should also keep in mind that England scraped the first test by 22 runs and should really have lost it.
England have played Bangladesh as much as New Zealand have. Facts aren't your strong point are they?
 

Blocky

Banned
England have played Bangladesh as much as New Zealand have. Facts aren't your strong point are they?
NZ have played an additional test against them and have further tests scheduled there, they've also played more in Bangladesh than England has.

They've also never lost to them in Test Cricket.
 

91Jmay

International Coach
NZ have played an additional test against them and have further tests scheduled there, they've also played more in Bangladesh than England has.

They've also never lost to them in Test Cricket.
England have played 10, New Zealand have played 11. My error missed the sole Test in NZ. So NZ don't play them considerably more at all
 
Last edited:

Dan_M_Bali

U19 Debutant
NZ have played an additional test against them and have further tests scheduled there, they've also played more in Bangladesh than England has.

They've also never lost to them in Test Cricket.
I believe their best bowler and England's destroyer-in-chief was on debut.
 

Top