I wish I could agree. And possibly I should.In terms of the commentators mentioning Ben Laughlin's record vs. Watson, it's laughable that CA think the Striker's management/analysts wouldn't be aware of player vs player statistics like this anyway. That is what the analysts do FFS, and a lot more in depth than that as well.
All-round stupidly.
I wish I could agree. And possibly I should.
Yet, over the years, I have been absolutely baffled about the lack of common sense professionalism in top sports Maybe the Strikers' management is doing a great job. To be fair, I have no clue whether they do or not. But I do know that lack of professionalism is common in professional sports.
How was Laughlin's 2 wickets from 7 balls obvious and easily accessible?You're technically correct. It was the fact it was such an easily accessible obvious stat was why I thought it was a bit of storm in a teacup.
Pretty sure Ben Laughlin himself would know. Doesn't get much more easily accessible than that.How was Laughlin's 2 wickets from 7 balls obvious and easily accessible?
Let's take two guys playing today. What's Ben Cutting's record when bowling to Cam White? I'll give you an hour.
All balls are logged by the teams, and matchups are one of the most important things that the T20 teams look at.How was Laughlin's 2 wickets from 7 balls obvious and easily accessible?
Let's take two guys playing today. What's Ben Cutting's record when bowling to Cam White? I'll give you an hour.
Really? That would be very surprising that a bowler knows how many balls he's bowled to a batsman over multiple games - without looking it up.omg Joe Burns' bowling
I can't unsee it
Pretty sure Ben Laughlin himself would know. Doesn't get much more easily accessible than that.
So would a team go into specifics "saying you've gotten him 2 times from 7 balls" or would they say you've had success bowling to him and remind him how you've got him out?All balls are logged by the teams, and matchups are one of the most important things that the T20 teams look at.
Depends on the coaching staff and their emphasis, but every team would have a log of every game in BBL (at least) that bowler x has bowled to batsman y, with their cumulative stats over that time if they wanted it.So would a team go into specifics "saying you've gotten him 2 times from 7 balls" or would they say you've had success bowling to him and remind him how you've got him out?
Mate if I'd gotten a certain player (especially a high profile) out quickly in the last couple games I'd played him there's no way I'm forgetting thatReally? That would be very surprising that a bowler knows how many balls he's bowled to a batsman over multiple games - without looking it up.