what is oxbridge? is it short for oxford & cambridge?BoyBrumby said:Not everyone who goes to Oxbridge is a genius, but I'd say it's a fair bet none are stupid.
or is it another big univ in england?
what is oxbridge? is it short for oxford & cambridge?BoyBrumby said:Not everyone who goes to Oxbridge is a genius, but I'd say it's a fair bet none are stupid.
Uhhh...as in: unlike Oxbridge?Neil Pickup said:Yeah, it's short for Oxford and Cambridge.
Camford sounds crap...
Haha classic!!!badgerhair said:However, some of us are less energetic than you and would prefer a pleasant afternoon in the sun watching some good cricketers demonstrating their skills to sitting at home devising ever more bizarre theories to explain why nobody should enjoy cricket or think any of the players are any good.
thanks for confirming...Neil Pickup said:Yeah, it's short for Oxford and Cambridge.
how about oxcam or camox or bridgeford...?Neil Pickup said:Camford sounds crap...
First one sounds like a charity, second some kind of chemical and the third's outside NottinghamAnil said:how about oxcam or camox or bridgeford...?
Freddie may have improved his first-chance average?Richard said:What would be gained by Flintoff hammering this around?
Yes, "the kids in the crowd" might've been enthused, but from a cricketing POV... what would have been gained?
the bang fielders are so butter-fingered that they might have reduced his "first-chance average"...Voltman said:Freddie may have improved his first-chance average?
I thought oxcam was a bovine rectal veiwing implementNeil Pickup said:First one sounds like a charity, second some kind of chemical and the third's outside Nottingham
Good post Mike.badgerhair said:Let me take you back a few years. Specifically to 1999 and the utterly abject performance England put up against New Zealand to become officially the worst team in the world.
I turned up to watch the England-Zimbabwe Test at Lord's in 2000 with some foreboding: although I thought we were strong enough to beat them and frankly ought to wipe the floor with them, I had some queasiness about whether or not England would actually deliver. It was by no means a foregone conclusion.
I find it rather reassuring that this game is a total mismatch. It should be a routine demolition job and it is. And that is a mark of how far we have come in the last six or seven years, because I can certainly remember when this would not have been routine.
Contrary to Richard's ridiculous assertion that this is like watching a county XXII against a club side, what it is actually like is watching a very good Test side coming up against a moderate international U-19 XI. After all, there's only about two or three Bangles who weren't eligible for the U-19s last year, if not this.
Naturally, it's a mismatch, but there is the same interest when watching the underdogs as there is in watching any U-19 side: you want to pick out the guys who are going to be good in years to come, and it looks to me like there are a few in this Bangladesh XI.
We already knew Mortaza and Rafique could bowl to county standard (although Rafique is already looking retirement in the face), but I've been fairly impressed with Aftab Ahmed, Anwar Hossain and especially Mushfiqur Rahim, who will be a big star some years from now.
They mostly haven't done themselves justice, showing that they are still too wide-eyed about being the first Bangladeshi team to play at Lord's Cricket Ground, London NW8. But a number of these young cricketers look pretty good to me and saying they are pathetic is pretty damn simplistic in my book.
Cheers,
Mike
You've suggested every person who has got in is because of that though, which I know for a fact to be a load of rubbish.Scaly piscine said:If you seriously think no-one has ever got into Oxbridge because of large donations from a rich Sultan etc. you really are incredibly naive.
I doubt it - this mythical figure doesn't count games with certain sides.Voltman said:Freddie may have improved his first-chance average?
i.e. anyone bar Australia due to all teams being not as good as they use to be.marc71178 said:I doubt it - this mythical figure doesn't count games with certain sides.
Haha, great post mate.badgerhair said:However, some of us are less energetic than you and would prefer a pleasant afternoon in the sun watching some good cricketers demonstrating their skills to sitting at home devising ever more bizarre theories to explain why nobody should enjoy cricket or think any of the players are any good.
Cheers,
Mike