I not 100% sure, but i think Symonds was bowling seamers, i remember someone posting about it earlier. Really should have played Simpson or a Batsmen, regardless though. Looking at th WA bowling attack, they probably should have played Marsh and Voges as specialist bowlers, i doubt they would have done a worse job.FaaipDeOiad said:Good game for Johnson with the ball, with 7 wickets. Watson seems to have done okay as well, kept it tight in the first innings and grabbed a couple of wickets in the second. Unfortunate about the duck, though. Langer had some good time in the middle too.
How come Symonds bowled 30 overs and Doran bowled 3? Assuming that the pitch was turning, surely Doran would have been a good option? Either way, comfortable win for Queensland, and WA are in dire straights now if they can't find a bowler. Bottom of the table season for them, you'd imagine.
Just realised I repeated most of your post, but I'd say Symonds bowled a lot because it was turning. Not sure why Doran didn't bowl, but Symonds was bowling his offies.Clapo said:Gilly goes for yet another dismal score, caught behind off Johnson for just 8
EDIT: Watson has just picked up his first wicket of the match. Really can't understand the make-up of the Queensland side. Why are we playing Doran when he has bowled a total of 7 overs for 39 runs in the match.
For that matter as well, why has Symonds, bowled 27 overs, compared to just 12 from watson, 18 for Johnson, & only 6 for Bichel in the second innings.
I just talked to someone who was at the game for the final session and they said he was bowling off-spinners. He may have been bowling seamers earlier in the day, though.chaminda_00 said:I not 100% sure, but i think Symonds was bowling seamers, i remember someone posting about it earlier. Really should have played Simpson or a Batsmen, regardless though. Looking at th WA bowling attack, they probably should have played Marsh and Voges as specialist bowlers, i doubt they would have done a worse job.
Yes please...Matt79 said:If the selectors are still set on an allrounder at 6, I wouldn't be surprised to see Symonds get up ahead of Clarke if Watson was injured.
You could be more wrong, but you'd really have to try.dontcloseyoureyes said:I'm almost 100% sure of this side being picked, even though it goes against everything I stand for:
Hayden
Langer
Ponting
Martyn
Hussey
Clarke
Gilchrist
Warne
Lee
Clark
McGrath
For the love of God I hate Michael Clarke, please pick Watson.