*Official* Australian Domestic Season Thread

[Johnners]

Haha, Love & Hopes giving Ben Edmonson a hammereing. 0-95 from 14

Love playing a blinder:

Love, ML 170 219b, 33x4, 1x6, SR: 77.63

 

[FaaipDeOiad]

The WA bowling attack is an absolute embarassment. Not sure when Dorey forgot how to bowl, but they've got nothing now. When Magoffin looks good compared to the rest of your attack, you've got problems.

 

[howardj]

You're on.

I'll back Warne.

.

No thanks.

With your track record of paying money you owe me, I wouldn't bet you five cents.

 

[chaminda_00]

I dunno. I didn't see the game, but from what I heard it wouldn't have mattered where anyone bowled. The sheer size of the ground is just rediculous for international cricket, and also, they will always target the most inexperienced bowler.

Won't play for Australia again, that's for sure. There's bad blood between Lewis and Ponting anyway.

I'll said before and i'll say it again, Lewis is the worst bowler to every play for Australia, he makes Zimbabwean bowlers look good.

 

[Josh]

I'll said before and i'll say it again, Lewis is the worst bowler to every play for Australia, he makes Zimbabwean bowlers look good.

That's funny.

 

[Johnners]

The WA bowling attack is an absolute embarassment. Not sure when Dorey forgot how to bowl, but they've got nothing now. When Magoffin looks good compared to the rest of your attack, you've got problems.

Agreed, Edmonson was absolutely terrible as well. About the only positive could've been Brad Hogg.

A Brilliant Innings from Love, i would love to see as a percentage how many of his centuries have been 130+ scores. Kyle pointed it out to me on msn that more often than not when he scores centuries, he scores them big, which from memory rings true.

A top knock from Hopes as well, he's really come of age these last 3 seasons, and is a definite chance of a WC birth.

 

[Matt79]

I'll said before and i'll say it again, Lewis is the worst bowler to every play for Australia, he makes Zimbabwean bowlers look good.

Muller?

 

[Dasa]

Agreed, Edmonson was absolutely terrible as well. About the only positive could've been Brad Hogg.

A Brilliant Innings from Love, i would love to see as a percentage how many of his centuries have been 130+ scores. Kyle pointed it out to me on msn that more often than not when he scores centuries, he scores them big, which from memory rings true.

A top knock from Hopes as well, he's really come of age these last 3 seasons, and is a definite chance of a WC birth.

26 out of 41 First Class 100s.

 

[Johnners]

Hahaha, to be far to muller, at least he took a few wickets.

 

[Johnners]

26 out of 41 First Class 100s.

Thanks Mate. Pretty Darn impressive stat!!! Shows what a quality batsmen he is IMO.

 

[Josh]

Hahaha, to be far to muller, at least he took a few wickets.

Lewis & Muller's figures are quite reasonably similar, however Muller played tests, whereas Lewis played ODI's; both have taken 7 wickets.

 

[Matt79]

Nobody ever seriously suggested giving Lewis a baggy green.

 

[Buddhmaster]

Been to the game today and yesterday, spent most of the time staying cool inside. Roughly 48 degrees here at the moment.

 

[chaminda_00]

Lewis & Muller's figures are quite reasonably similar, however Muller played tests, whereas Lewis played ODI's; both have taken 7 wickets.

Muller played two test and Lewis played 7 ODIs. Muller is 10 times a better bowler then Lewis, but that just shows how crap Lewis is really.

 

[Josh]

Muller played two test and Lewis played 7 ODIs. Muller is 10 times a better bowler then Lewis, but that just shows how crap Lewis is really.

Completely discarding all domestic figures, I gather??

 

[Dasa]

Completely discarding all domestic figures, I gather??

Muller's domestic figures are far better than Lewis'.

 

[marc71178]

Thanks Mate. Pretty Darn impressive stat!!! Shows what a quality batsmen he is IMO.

130 is a bit of a low barrier to turn a century into a "big century" though isn't it?

 

[vic_orthdox]

130 is a bit of a low barrier to turn a century into a "big century" though isn't it?

Not if you're Mark Waugh...

 

[mikeW]

VIC 3/ 189

White 36* (99)
Hodge 89* (164)

 

[Johnners]

130 is a bit of a low barrier to turn a century into a "big century" though isn't it?

Probably, 150 would've been fairer.