Yeah and India will bowl Jadhav and Shankar for 10 overs at least on this pitch lol. Dhawan looking the goods thoughThis looks like a proper road.
this is a 350+ wicket.Saw that big shot coming from Rohit a mile away, looked so annoyed at giving a maiden over to Maxwell
That is about dead right considering many factors like longevity, era adjustments, world cup performances.One could say that Kohli is a moderate upgrade on Tendulkar.
I rate de Villiers ahead of Tendulkar. De Villiers always scared me more than Tendulkar. Not too much between them though.That is about dead right considering many factors like longevity, era adjustments, world cup performances.
1. Viv
2. Kohli
3. Tendulkar
4. ABD
5. Ponting
I would say that the gap between Kohli and Viv is one Viv innings(138*).
I used to think the same an year back. His retirement before the world cup brings him down slightly imo. Not much between them anyways as you mentioned.I rate de Villiers ahead of Tendulkar. De Villiers always scared me more than Tendulkar. Not too much between them though.
Name one.These 2 need to get going now, India's got heavy hitters all the way down.
Do we really have ? Shankar is at 7 and Bhuvi at 8.These 2 need to get going now, India's got heavy hitters all the way down.
Dude Pant, Jadhav, Kohli and Rahul can all go for broke rather easily.Name one.
Damn, I missed that Pant is playing. No one else is a hitter - they are all proper batsman, India has no heavy hitter in the main team apart from Pandya.Dude Pant, Jadhav, Kohli and Rahul can all go for broke rather easily.
By heavy hitter I meant someone who can score quick from ball one, Kohli and Rahul can easily come in and play a 50 (25) type innings if the sitution demands.Damn, I missed that Pant is playing. No one else is a hitter - they are all proper batsman, India has no heavy hitter in the main team apart from Pandya.
Yeah, but I'd rather let the openers bat and come back into form. I really don't think the batsman who are gonna come in are capable of accelerating beyond what a set Rohit/Dhawan will anyway do.Long innings of sub-100 SR on a flat deck are a genuine risk these days, so I can understand the concern. We see so many of them ending up in losses. See Gayle's first 100 in the recent series against England for an example.
So they are not back in form batting at 60 and 80 odd?Yeah, but I'd rather let the openers bat and come back into form. I really don't think the batsman who are gonna come in are capable of accelerating beyond what a set Rohit/Dhawan will anyway do.
Maybe they are, maybe they aren't - who knows.So they are not back in form batting at 60 and 80 odd?