Keep this up and some of our biggest flaws have been cleared.Cummins and Zampa clearly leading the way with the ball this series. Glad Cummins could improve so much in ODIs.
Anything but settled despite the impressive figures at the top. Who apart from Kohli can you depend on to come good at least every other game? We are carrying passengers in Rayudu and Jadeja, both pivotal positions in a 50 over innings. Our top 2 seem to think their placid starts will always be covered by Kohli and the bowlers but if the trend continues we're looking mediocre 260 odd scores and only the occasional 300+.India's top order is settled I reckon. Jadeja looks like a domestic one day #4 - out of position and more importantly out of his depth in this team.
I've always wondered whether this differential is something chasing batsmen pay attention to even more than RRR. Seems that it might be."I have to play the game that's gotten me till this level, and that's the same thing I want to continue in the middle. I was really disappointed I got out - I really thought we had a chance there with the difference of 20 between balls and runs. That's what happens - Australia played better and Adam bowled really well and they deserved to win."
What the actual ****?Kohli is averaging 83 at 100 with 19 hundreds as captain in 66 ODIs. It's cheating.
Rahul should have got more match practice. Could be backup for Rayudu too. And Pant should have got enough games too but we are stuck with Dhoni. Those 2 (Rayudu and Dhoni) are biggest weak links.Rohit and Dhawan being completely out of form is making us vulnerable at the moment. Hopefully they can recover it by the World Cup. Not too worried since they're proven class and have more than enough credit in the bank. Rayudu doesn't look up to it, and TBH, never really has, but he's somehow averaged 50 and I don't know what other alternative we have at this point. He'll probably make the squad at the very least.
Overconfidence and carelessness did him in.Pressure got to him yesterday, not good enough sorry
Yep. If he wins a WC and continues this for at least 8 more years then he can be considered top tier.Overconfidence and carelessness did him in.
If he can do that, he may be considered to belong to the highest tier; on par with other legendary stars like Mark Waugh. If. WC. etc.Yep. If he wins a WC and continues this for at least 8 more years then he can be considered top tier.
He of courses played very well. I'm not saying or implying anything else at all. On that one ball his concentration did lapse. After hitting 2 back to back boundaries he played a rather odd shot and yorked himself.Overconfidence and carelessness, really? The bloke who made 123 (95) to keep us in it single-handedly while the next highest contribution was 32?