tooextracool
International Coach
u just proved my point there didnt you? i was saying that for someone who has been having a poor series u need to throw some really poor bowling at him to let him hammer u all over the place.....but the australian bowling at the scg wasnt poor...it was horrible, and on a pitch that was absolutely flat scoring 240 when the entire team scores 700 for 7 odd wickets is no great feat. gillys case is completely different...we know that he has not only been struggling in this series but on slow turning tracks in general and for him to go around hammering an attack that consists of murali, vaas and zoysa in SL requires some really bad bowling.Samuel_Vimes said:Hmm, I seem to remember a certain bloke named Sachin Tendulkar at the SCG? 301 without losing his wicket at all - after a pretty poor series otherwise, and not exactly great history either. Just saying that it is possible to bat well even if your history at a place isn't that good.
(ok, so the attack was Lee, Gillespie and Bracken, and I know you don't rate Tendulkar...)
And i do rate tendulkar as a good batsman who would find a place in and side in the world, but for people to go around calling him the best batsman since don bradman is an insult to all the other great players.