Yeah, there's a fair possibility for a small lead or deficit - it's not as if the game is lost yet. And the Aussies don't have to bat last on this wicket, so if we start again from near-scratch in the third innings, they should still hold an advantage. Of course, if the Sri Lankans should go 80-100 up or so, it's probably all over.Swervy said:have faith...220 odd might be enough
I think the first test was in Kandy and that was the test which had the collision, so that counts Gillespie out. Hayden was in the squad but he didn't play in the series. He did spend quite a bit of time on the field during the first test, with Waugh & Gillespie in hospital, took a catch if I remember correctly.Slow Love™ said:I don't think Hayden was playing back in that series. I'd say Gillespie (who could forget that collision), Warne and Ponting.
Ha, you're right - it's kinda funny that I'd remember the collision so well, and yet fail to remember that it's exactly why Gillespie wasn't playing in that match... :PMister Wright said:I think the first test was in Kandy and that was the test which had the collision, so that counts Gillespie out. Hayden was in the squad but he didn't play in the series. He did spend quite a bit of time on the field during the first test, with Waugh & Gillespie in hospital, took a catch if I remember correctly.
And Warne regains the lead.Adamc said:Warne and Murali tied on 491 wickets apiece now...
Why does that scare you?Langeveldt said:I fear Murali will get there first. Even tho Shane has an innings in hand