Why?Steulen said:Well, egg on my face there with Ponting setting a target of 410 with 130 overs remaining...
Aussie ****iness taking over, I feel. South Africa will think that all they have to do is not get out and they'll reach the target. It's basically a gift which needs to be carefully unwrapped or it'll break.
Whatever the outcome...poor captaincy by Ponting
Perth only 3 months ago :|social said:However, nothing they've done for years suggests they've got a snowflakes chance in hell of surviving more than a couple of sessions.
Pretty tough snowflake then, to stand this much chance.social said:Why?
Aus could've batted SA into oblivion.
At least they've given them something of a chance.
If SA reach the target then well done.
However, nothing they've done for years suggests they've got a snowflakes chance in hell of surviving more than a couple of sessions.
Disagree with that. I think 350 would have been ample. If anything, particularly given the inclement weather, Punter batted on too long.Steulen said:Well, egg on my face there with Ponting setting a target of 410 with 130 overs remaining...
Aussie ****iness taking over, I feel. South Africa will think that all they have to do is not get out and they'll reach the target. It's basically a gift which needs to be carefully unwrapped or it'll break.
Whatever the outcome...poor captaincy by Ponting
Yeah, you have to be able to back your 'verbals' up. Against Australia, it's pretty tough to do. In this current South African team, Kallis is the only batsman who can - he doesn't say much though. Smith would be better off letting Warnie go through to the 'keeper...the verbals too!KaZoH0lic said:On a side note - Gotta love Warne bugging Smith.
Kallis is a fabulous player - technically the best I've seen and only behind Ponting as a player because he "seemingly" lacks the balls to take his game to the next level by sacrificing his average for the better good of the team.Steulen said:Pretty tough snowflake then, to stand this much chance.
SA bats down to nine, has an all-time great in Kallis as well as a couple of current era top-notchers in Smith and Gibbs, and players capable of cneturies in difficult circumstances in De Villiers, Boucher and even Pollock. Oh, and then there's Rudolph, Prince and Boje.
I concur that Australia are overwhelming favourites, my argument is that with delaying the declaration for just 10 or 12 overs more , Ponting could have taken the loss out of the equation without compromising his victory chances. To me, it's another example of a captain being too ****y for his own good a lot of the time.
Well said.social said:Kallis is a fabulous player - technically the best I've seen and only behind Ponting as a player because he "seemingly" lacks the balls to take his game to the next level by sacrificing his average for the better good of the team.
But, let's face it, this series is over.
Aus leads 3 - 0 and only weather can save SA from embarrassment.
1 over, 10 overs, whatever cannot change the fact that SA are done and dusted.
Would you care to explain why you're negative? Why aren't the posts founded and why is it arrogant to point out the obvious? Sounds like bitter grapes to me.Scaly piscine said:Seems like a few people in this thread need another 'Aussies slammed down to Earth' game like what happened in the last ODI - that obviously didn't knock enough of the arrogance out. Very unlikely to happen in this game, but if it did it would be made all the more enjoyable by the comments in this thread.
I think you're over-rating them slightly there.Steulen said:SA bats down to nine, has an all-time great in Kallis as well as a couple of current era top-notchers in Smith and Gibbs, and players capable of cneturies in difficult circumstances in De Villiers, Boucher and even Pollock. Oh, and then there's Rudolph, Prince and Boje.
If who wins?dontcloseyoureyes said:If they win I'll eat my pants!
Those who actively seek it won't get it.dontcloseyoureyes said:I really want the Greig
I completely agree. 350 is plenty. A freak happening may occur but if you try and plan for the extremely unusual you play far too defensive and lose a lot of initiative.howardj said:Disagree with that. I think 350 would have been ample. If anything, particularly given the inclement weather, Punter batted on too long.