Maybe SA should drop him down the order to 4 or 5 so that Kallis and Prince/Rudolph can build the SA total and then Gibbs can go out and play his free flowing game. If a wicket falls early Gibbs isn't reliable enough to build a total and that is why SA are 2 down without many runs on the board.chalky said:Gibbs didn't fancy the battle out there I'm afraid. Even those one eyed cheerleaders in the commentry box where saying so. When the pressure is on Hershelle needs to grow a set and show a bit of fight.
The guy has only played 15 tests !!!Nnanden said:Well then I hope you never select a side. It`s called a lapse in form. Most humans have one.
Australia had very attacking fields with lots of gaps. And Warne only bowled the last over before tea. I'm sure Clark will be on soon.andyc said:Wow. South Africa notch up 40 odd runs in 10 overs, big contrast to the Aussie innings. To anyone watching, was it just loose bowling, or is it becoming easier to bat? Strange decision to bring on Warnie before Clark though.
Change the record...Demolition Man said:ohh clark again 4, very nice stroke, does anyone else agree that he should move up to 10 ???
12.3 Lee to de Villiers, 2 runs, excellent delivery outside off stump swings in, de Villiers drives, hits the pad in line, loud shout, given not out, Bucknor has not signalled leg byes, may be there was an inside edge.Dydl said:?
EDIT: I can't watch it on TV...
It has a way of balancing itself out but Lee would not be too pleased having already been given out caught behind while batting when he got nowhere near the ball.social said:Cricket's an unfair game - Lee should have at least 4 wickets, he's got 1 and is going at 6 an over.