I still don't agree. The ball didn't straighten enough and would have comfortably missed legstump. Its a shame they don't have hawkeye in this series.Sehwag309 said:Open ur eyes WIDE and watch the replay, umpires agree, comm agree...would have clipped leg stump
Never heard that b4 but didn't he walk in WC 04 Semi's, I guess that proves his honestyFaaipDeOiad said:That should answer the cynics who claim that Gilchrist only walks when his team can afford him to be out.
Australia have lost 6-99 since lunch now.
And no, no hawkeye for Fox Sports viewers.
No we aren't getting hawkeye. Makes a difference when you introduce new technology and then they take it away.Sehwag309 said:Question to FOX SPORTS Viewers, it seems we are getting the same feed...but still, are you getting hawk-eye
..seems Ten Sports who is proving the feed didn't license the Hawk-eye Software this timemavric41 said:No we aren't getting hawkeye. Makes a difference when you introduce new technology and then they take it away.
Kumble wasn't playing in 2001, so this twin spin attack makes a lotta differenceJono said:God I love Gilly, he's such an honest cricketer, and a great guy. I saw him on the news playing with the young Indian kids in the slums, it's just great to see.
Oh and GOOD ON YA KUMBLE! What a fight back by India! The commentators were saying only Harbhajan was going to bowl Australia out, but we have two champion spinners in this team, never forget Kumble.
Whoever said that (I've never heard it) is an idiot.FaaipDeOiad said:That should answer the cynics who claim that Gilchrist only walks when his team can afford him to be out.
Somewhat similar to 2001, great start and then collapseMr Casson said:That's what I mean. Now Kumble has another one. Geez, Louise...
EXACTLY!Sehwag309 said:Kumble wasn't playing in 2001, so this twin spin attack makes a lotta difference
...exactly, India is yet to bat...also same pattern with starts and collapse...amazing reallyJono said:EXACTLY!
In 2001, Harbhajan had 34 (or something like that) wickets, next best was Zaheer with 3. Now we have two great spinners bowling, and maybe Pathan can get in on it at some stage.
Things are looking good, I don't want to get too excited but I can't help it.
Actually India collapsed first in the second match.Sehwag309 said:Somewhat similar to 2001, great start and then collapse
I meant the Madras game, but your'e right India hasn't batted yetMr Casson said:Actually India collapsed first in the second match.
Maybe it will be India's turn to have a colossal stuff up.