noooFor india, Shami and Bumrah are sure starters and looks like Thakur is getting the nod ahead of Saini, he adds
Speaking of which I do recall him having to take pills for his knee or ankle at one point during the Melbourne test.Not really true. He often picks up injuries/niggles at the end of a Test series so he doesnt play more because he isnt 100%, not because its a JAMODI.
Haha I mainly wanted Saini to play to see if it made someone pick him in CPL if he took a few cheap wickets.nooo
That's positively an insaini decison by the selectorsnooo
Im pretty pleased for Kane Richardson. This is the XI I would have picked tbh.
Who would you pick? Lyon instead of Zampa and who ahead of Agar?Yeah same I guess. Quicks and top six were basically locks for me, but I'm less thrilled about the spin and allround options. Agar at seven bothers me less than the alternative of locking yourself into at least ten overs from Marnus+Short+Smith so I probably would've rolled with this eleven too but it still strikes me as a bit ehhh balance-wise.
Yeah I think they picked the right bats but I would've gone Rahul or Dhawan at four. I don't think it's as huge a deal as is being made out by the commentators though; they've been carrying on about it since the start of the game and made some pretty lolsy arguments about it even though I agree with their conclusion.Hopefully this opens the eyes for the Indian team management that batting arguably the best ODI batsman ever out of position is not all that clever.
If Rahul needs to play in the XI, let him develop into a #4 or #5.
It would be nice if someone in the top 7 could bowl pace. Seems kinda weird just having a bunch of spinners.Yeah same I guess. Quicks and top six were basically locks for me, but I'm less thrilled about the spin and allround options. Agar at seven bothers me less than the alternative of locking yourself into at least ten overs from Marnus+Short+Smith so I probably would've rolled with this eleven too but it still strikes me as a bit ehhh balance-wise.
eh, not this debate again.Hopefully this opens the eyes for the Indian team management that batting arguably the best ODI batsman ever out of position is not all that clever.
If Rahul needs to play in the XI, let him develop into a #4 or #5.
FTFY z.Hopefully this opens the eyes for the Australian team management that batting arguably the best ODI batsman ever out of position is not all that clever.
If Labuschagne needs to play in the XI, let him develop into a #4 or #5.