• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia in England (The Ashes)

luckyeddie

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
They used to say in darts that a good marker would always beat a good player, but can someone explain to me how Cricinfo have the score as 44-0 off 11 and BBC have it at 56-0 off 11?
 
aussie

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
Blaze said:
Worried? You are dead set gone. Flat track, England have added another batsman to their line up, rain is expected in the next couple of days and you guys haven't picked up any early wickets.

It will be a great series in AUS when the aussies try win them back. If this series had been played in AUS I am not so sure the score would be 2-1 to England.
Click to expand...
Australia have been under the cosh since Edgbagston mate & i've been supporting them since then & i'm not changing in the face of adversity no now, not at alllllllllll
 
Blaze

Blaze

Banned
aussie said:
Australia have been under the cosh since Edgbagston mate & i've been supporting them since then & i'm not changing in the face of adversity no now, not at alllllllllll
Click to expand...

It's not a matter of support. Belief perhaps
 
G

greg

International Debutant
luckyeddie said:
They used to say in darts that a good marker would always beat a good player, but can someone explain to me how Cricinfo have the score as 44-0 off 11 and BBC have it at 56-0 off 11?
Click to expand...
cricbuzz.com is much better than cricinfo
 
nick-o

nick-o

State 12th Man
Cricinfo gone crazy


Cricinfo has Tresco on 20 off 43 and Strauss 33 off 38
BBC has Tresco on 33 off 51 and Strauss 20 off 30
Cricbuzz has Tresco on 33 off 51 and Strauss 20 off 29
 
aussie

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
gosh what a frustrating 1st hour this pitch is a real road, hardly any alarms for England other than the 2 close LBW shouts but if Australia can get 2 before lunch that will do give them some confidence for the remainder of the day.....
 
luckyeddie

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
greg said:
cricbuzz.com is much better than cricinfo
Click to expand...
You're not the first to suggest that.

Cricinfo reckon that Strauss's 30 includes 9 boundaries - shan't buy a used car off those fellows.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top