King_Ponting
International Regular
how so?
Who's second choice then?marc71178 said:He's our 3rd choice spinner.
Your's is Nathan Hauritz...
I agree marc it is even worse when you compare Batty to Hogg.marc71178 said:Which makes it even worse!
Now now marc you go on about players being unproven yet you claim the ODI wicketless Swann is Englands second best spinner.marc71178 said:If fit, Swann I would say.
I was talking Test matches.Scallywag said:I agree marc it is even worse when you compare Batty to Hogg.
Everyone else has been tried and found out - Swann is ahead of the rest IMO.Scallywag said:Now now marc you go on about players being unproven yet you claim the ODI wicketless Swann is Englands second best spinner.
Personally I thought his figures were pretty moderate at Northants, especially as their home ground was supposed to be one of the most spinner-friendly in the country. And for someone who's supposed to be able to bat a bit, he doesn't seem to do very much there either. Maybe the move to Notts will give him the kick up the butt he appears to need.marc71178 said:Everyone else has been tried and found out - Swann is ahead of the rest IMO.
And you're probably right on both counts. Still, it would give him the opportunity to retire from test cricket for a third time, which would be some sort of record.Steulen said:I think Croft should return if Giles remains injured. I guess he'd be less likely to crumble in a heap than any of the others.
Fat chance, though.
Nah he's talking about the 2003 fixture (actually our second match) where we won by 7 wickets easily - Flintoff didn't play.aussie said:That was a fantastic roses clash seeing Freddie take them apart with a brutal 85.
oh well thats the game i attendedsuperkingdave said:Nah he's talking about the 2003 fixture (actually our second match) where we won by 7 wickets easily - Flintoff didn't play.
Last year Flintoff played, the match was at headingly, and though Flintoff did bat well, it was our bowlers that were taken apart by Ian Harvey in the end
Is there coverage of this somewhere other than cricinfo (which doesn't even have the TEAMS announced yet)?Scaly piscine said:Friggin knew it, Australia wins the toss and fields.
Just CEEFAX (teletext), which says updates delayed - technical problems.FaaipDeOiad said:Is there coverage of this somewhere other than cricinfo (which doesn't even have the TEAMS announced yet)?
Bleh, figures.Scaly piscine said:Just CEEFAX (teletext), which says updates delayed - technical problems.
highly improbable mateSteulen said:I think Croft should return if Giles remains injured. I guess he'd be less likely to crumble in a heap than any of the others.
Fat chance, though.