aussie
Hall of Fame Member
yea i know what he meantKing_Ponting said:I think you mean inconclusive, otherwise u contradict yourself
yea i know what he meantKing_Ponting said:I think you mean inconclusive, otherwise u contradict yourself
Yes. Too bad the laws do not incorporate inclusion of technology in such casesaussie said:well it conclusively showed that Ponting had a little inside edge but not only edges other aspect such as bat-pads, balls that flick the glove etc......
LOLPY said:Don't need technology, I called it.
gee almost had me worried their....aussie said:Boy if their was a time for Pup to makea BIG one its definately now.
Yeah, hand off your microphone please, TannyPY said:Calm down Tanny, Flintoff looking like Sachin?
if it wasn't greigy he is always comparing someone with TendulakrPY said:Calm down Tanny, Flintoff looking like Sachin?
Interesting idea thrown in about hooking the umpires up to the stump-mic via earpiece to aid them?Slow Love™ said:LOL
I've gotta say though, regardless of whether it gets included in the third umpire's armory, that super slomo close-up stuff really is absolutely incredible and makes what seems at first glance fairly indiscernable very clear. I'm a huge fan.
I completely agree with what you said there that I've bolded, and argued that re: Bell when Marc kept insisting that him going out to decent balls wasn't failing. But IMO, the English (with the exception of Hoggard) have just put together far more consistent spells of decent bowling, where our bowlers have quite often taken the foot off the pedal and let the English coast after negotiating the odd troubling period.FaaipDeOiad said:I don't think you have to get yourself out for the batting to be poor though. Yes, it's poor batting if you go for a big slog and get yourself caught, but it's also poor batting if you can't handle a bit of gentle inswing from the new ball with a guy like Hoggard bowling. The reason Australia are struggling is because their batting has consistenly crumbled under pressure, sometimes because they couldn't handle good bowling and grind it out, and sometimes because they simply gave their wickets away. Australia have bowled very well at times, but the English batting, despite what would generally be agreed is less ability oevrall, has been able to see off the hard periods and still make runs. When Jones and Flintoff have bowled well, Australia has fallen to bits, while aside from the second innings at Lords against McGrath and at Edgbaston against Warne, England have stood up and managed good scores despite some good bowling.
Part of it is poor form, part of it is poor planning, and part of it is indeed lack of experience against actual swing bowling in Australian conditions recently, but whatever your explaination for it is, Australia's batting has consistently failed despite three of the four pitches in the series so far being very, very good for batting.
Think he's slightly redeeming himself today.Slow Love™ said:But IMO, the English (with the exception of Hoggard) have just put together far more consistent spells of decent bowling