andyc said:Good catch, but an unnecessary shot by Langer
Langer made it look as if he was playing Muralitharan on a bunsen.Nnanden said:Giles really wasn`t turning many, but that one went a bit.
I'd prefer a Ponting 150-200 with Hayden chipping in with a century. Hey, you can always hopeNnanden said:We need a huge partnership here. Hayden 100 and Ponting 50 would do me fine.
At least I was being slightly realistic.andyc said:I'd prefer a Ponting 150-200 with Hayden chipping in with a century. Hey, you can always hope
Being unrealistic would be saying Ponting and Hayden both with triple centuries. I mean, we've seen Warne, Lee and Kasper put on more runs than the top order have of both sides this series at times. You just never knowNnanden said:At least I was being slightly realistic.![]()
i know! cricket has to be one of the sports with the most technology used by commentary teams. i just love it allNnanden said:Man those slow-mo replays are something.
It's amazing that with all the technology we have now with regard to delivery tracking etc those who aren't watching on TV are still stuck with poorly written text commentary. I checked out the Major League Baseball website once and watched a game on there with their online viewing thing (free, I might add), and it had so much information. You could see on a little online diagram where the pitch went, what the batter did, where it was hit to and what happened etc. Even AFL has little diagrams now showing you what is happening. Cricinfo is pretty poor in comparison.andyc said:i know! cricket has to be one of the sports with the most technology used by commentary teams. i just love it all