FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
Lunch. 5/70 in the session.
yes you are when an finger spinner is bowling..but when Warne is bowling, padding up isnt so straight forward..even if he bowls a wide outside leg line, more often than not he is attempting to hit the wicketsScaly piscine said:I'm referring to when Giles changes his line to well outside leg, not his usual line of on leg-stump, just in case anyone is unsure. That line well outside leg is negative, you're basically not going to bowl anyone out (barring an inability to pad the ball away). You're relying on dumbness/impatience from the batsman.
70 runs - five wickets, some great bowling, poor batting, unlucky dismissals, lucky not to get out, some entertaining hitting - we have had it all.FaaipDeOiad said:Lunch. 5/70 in the session.
It doesn't matter how much it turns, all you have to do is cover the stumps.Top_Cat said:Not true against a leggie turning it a mile. Those are so not easy to play or even to just kick away because you have no idea how much it's actually going to turn.
Tragically that sounds a sound investment.superkingdave said:just put a fiver on England to score less than 180 at 5/6, hopefully thats a fiver down the drain
Giles will turn it plenty enough to hit the stumps as well, because it's coming from footmarks, even he can turn it quite a distance. The extra foot of turn Warne gets doesn't make it any less of a negative tactic because both will hit the stumps on occasion turning it from the footmarks and both will be utterly nullified if the batsman pad it away.Swervy said:yes you are when an finger spinner is bowling..but when Warne is bowling, padding up isnt so straight forward..even if he bowls a wide outside leg line, more often than not he is attempting to hit the wickets
RightioShane Warne said:Graham Thorpe looks like a stumpy dwarf.
Shortest...Arms...Ever!
Get out of town.Shane Warne said:Not necessarily.
They just showed something to suggest it wasn't conclusive from our angles, none of which are the same view Koertzen had.
All too easy from the couch, ain't it?Giles will turn it plenty enough to hit the stumps as well, because it's coming from footmarks, even he can turn it quite a distance. The extra foot of turn Warne gets doesn't make it any less of a negative tactic because both will hit the stumps on occasion turning it from the footmarks and both will be utterly nullified if the batsman pad it away.
Just going by what they said on TV.luckyeddie said:Get out of town.
He missed the ball by about six inches. You really haven't got a leg to stand on - just stop making yourself look an even bigger fool (if that's at all possible).
* grunts in agreement *luckyeddie said:Get out of town.
He missed the ball by about six inches. You really haven't got a leg to stand on - just stop making yourself look an even bigger fool (if that's at all possible).
But will probably leave us our best bowler short. Looking gloomy now for England.Scaly piscine said:This injury might actually make Flintoff bat better and properly, which will be good while Geraint is still there.
Quite right.luckyeddie said:He was out though - the umpire said so, and that's good enough for me. Unlike you, I accept the good and the bad decisions equally because I am a mature adult.