Bull, he was on top of the stumps and it hit in front of middle, at most it would have just missed leg stump.social said:Rudi whatever his name is is really an appalling umpire.
Gillespie's lbw would've missed by a minimum of 6 inches.
Never said Kaspa's wasn't. Just compounded the bad Dizzy decision as Aus were recovering somewhat.PY said:That one out mate?
Granted England have had a break with Dizzy but how can you say the other two weren't out? Hawkeye shows Langer's was hitting legstump and Kaspa was plumb as you like.
You stop screaming foul at everything, I'll start listening and debating.
Sorry, but how many mistakes can you make before someone is declared as just plain incompetent?Dasa said:Koertzen isn't that bad. Certainly not bad enough to described as 'appalling'.
no it wont be that simple.Anil said:england has a sizeable lead now...they should win this one from here on...
Yeah definately. Australia will either need to bowl England out for 200 or less with a brilliant bowling performance, or chase a massive total.Anil said:england has a sizeable lead now...they should win this one from here on...
I can tell you are upset, and you have my utmost sympathy.social said:Rudi whatever his name is is really an appalling umpire.
Gillespie's lbw would've missed by a minimum of 6 inches.
Leave your mother out of this, cheerleader chick.steds said:![]()
![]()
EASY! EASY! EASY! EASY!
Jesus Christ, the game's only half over and you bloody whingeing Aussies have started already.social said:Sorry, but how many mistakes can you make before someone is declared as just plain incompetent?
I suppose he'll make it all up by apologising again![]()
That's rich, coming from a tailender.NZTailender said:When you make one.![]()
You'll notice I didnt say biased,.luckyeddie said:I can tell you are upset, and you have my utmost sympathy.
No, really, I mean that. Poor show all round - definitely biased. How much do you think he's been paid?
Still, look on the bright side of things. If your lot actually end up losing, at least you will now have TWO excuses.
It should be. If England get over 250 in their second innings they'd have to do something ridiculous to lose from there. The pitch is fine so I don't see why they shouldn't be able to do that.aussie said:no it wont be that simple.
Yes, Gilchrist made 49, Flintoff 68Slow Love™ said:Gilchrist was batting very intelligently there (and proving that comparisons to Flintoff are extremely unfair)
Shane Warne said:Leave your mother out of this, cheerleader chick.
social said:Sorry, but how many mistakes can you make before someone is declared as just plain incompetent?
I suppose he'll make it all up by apologising again![]()
The key word was "intelligently".Samuel_Vimes said:Yes, Gilchrist made 49, Flintoff 68
(sorry, had to)![]()
No need to apologise, as you only made yourself look stupid.Samuel_Vimes said:Yes, Gilchrist made 49, Flintoff 68
(sorry, had to)![]()
I'll hold my hand up and say I was one of them. I just didn't think the pitch had anything in it for England's bowling but two things (not the players' talent) have pleasantly surprised me about today.Slow Love™ said:Ah, the pessimism of some of the English fans was in full swing yesterday, I see...407 certainly looks a good score today.