Slats4ever
International Vice-Captain
He can have my hammy if he wants. i'll give him a transplant.
It's his ankle, not his hammy.Slats4ever said:He can have my hammy if he wants. i'll give him a transplant.
He's already got enough pigs from what I've heard.Slats4ever said:doesn't take away from the fact he can still have my hammy
Slats4ever said:doesn't take away from the fact he can still have my hammy
Confirmed.andyc said:I sure hope Pigeon gets better. Either way, it's a perfect chance for Gillespie (and Kasper, if he plays for McGrath) to stand up and show what he can do.
Still, I think he will be too good for the England middle orderPedro Delgado said:
No, McGrath is a loss. But Gillespie can now play as an opening bowler while Kasprowicz wreaks havoc with the old ball. I'd still rate this attack higher than England's.Pothas said:Im not so sure suddenly Australia dont seem as ominous even if they still have a very good atack is it now much better than Englands? i think only warne makes a difference between them now
Harmisoon, Flintoff are just as good if not better than any of Australias 3 bowlers so id say the pace atacks are now about equal. As i say the only real difference in the bowling is now warne. Im not saying the teams as a whole are now equal but it can be denied that this makes it a lot closer. It is also a dampish green wicket Warne on a similar pitch at the rose bowl earlier this year decided too bowl some seam maybe hel try the samwSteulen said:No, McGrath is a loss. But Gillespie can now play as an opening bowler while Kasprowicz wreaks havoc with the old ball. I'd still rate this attack higher than England's.
Well if McGrath's injury doesn't give England some much needed confidence then nothing will - there may be difficult batting conditions this morning but Australia have lost their first test star and if England start strongly, they have a chance IMO.Steulen said:No, McGrath is a loss. But Gillespie can now play as an opening bowler while Kasprowicz wreaks havoc with the old ball. I'd still rate this attack higher than England's.
I still rate Australia's attack higher - without Lee, it may be a different story though. Flintoff seemed to struggle a little in the first test facing the Australian batsmen, Hoggard was inconsistent and it appears as though Jones' confidence comes and goes. In my opinion, Kasprowicz and Gillespie, although particularly the latter is definitely out of form, still combine with Lee and Warne to form a stronger line-up.Pothas said:Harmisoon, Flintoff are just as good if not better than any of Australias 3 bowlers so id say the pace atacks are now about equal. As i say the only real difference in the bowling is now warne. Im not saying the teams as a whole are now equal but it can be denied that this makes it a lot closer. It is also a dampish green wicket Warne on a similar pitch at the rose bowl earlier this year decided too bowl some seam maybe hel try the samw
Where does it say that? TV coverage?Steulen said:S Warne (RM)? Cool.