age_master
Hall of Fame Member
macgill is still under pressure to retain his place in the NSW squad for next year!!!
For one reason, his bowling.Top_Cat said:Why didn't England pick Paul Collingwood in their 11? The guy's in form and they could have easily dispensed with John Crawley, as they should have done for the Boxing Day Test.
Dident u see Im supprised Lee did not take 3 or 4 wickets in that spell at one stage he beat the bat 8 times in two overs.Rik said:Hmmm, Australia loose their World Class New Ball Bowler and England loose 2 cheap Wickets...why can't we just kick a side rather than let it get more confidence?
Well remember that when McGrath is back in the team, Gillespie and McGrath take the new ball and Lee is more effective when the ball is swinging, which it does not when he comes on as the ball is less shiny.Eclipse said:Dident u see Im supprised Lee did not take 3 or 4 wickets in that spell at one stage he beat the bat 8 times in two overs.
The big thing for Lee is now to come back from that spell when the ball wont be swinging.
1st time anyone's said that to meEclipse said:Yes that is 100% correct there Ric
He is probably a better new ball bowler Than Gillespie even but untill he can earn the right to open the bowling by bowling better Line and Length with the older ball he does not deserve the privlage.
Obviously he has the talent but hard work and more mental concerntration are needed by him when the ball is not swinging.
What the.....? How do you figure?He is probably a better new ball bowler Than Gillespie
Though those times are usually widely spaced...Eclipse said:No Lee always bowl well with the new ball.
At times he looks totaly deadly with the new ball.
The key phrase being 'at times' Gillespie almost always looks dangerous with the new-ball. There's nothing worse as a captain than seeing someone who's quick but inconsistent concede 5-an-over with the new-ball, unless that results in quite a few wickets, which it most certainly doesn't with Brett Lee most times. Gillespie is a FAR superior new-ball bowler than Brett Lee right now and other than the pace issue (though Gillepie is hardly slow), there's very little justification for your assertion that Brett Lee uses the new-ball better.No Lee always bowl well with the new ball.
At times he looks totaly deadly with the new ball.
Yes, we need an all rounder, but they're all injured!WCCC_SOMERSET said:
England are playing the worst spinner in international cricket. and vaughan can't bowl bcoz of his shoulder. england won the toss and elected to bat. bichel comes in for mcgrath. same team as last test with just the change mentioned. surpisingly Hogg is 12th man. england going in with just 4 bowlers i think is a mistake. they desperately need an all-rounder.
They went with Crawley as he was initially selected and hasn't had too bad a series.Top_Cat said:Okay fine but what about his BATTING? He's hit a great hundred against SL without really extending himself and yet that's not rewarded with a Test place? Let's face it; Crawley and Stewart aren't in great form and so you have to pick guys who are in form. Collingwood's obviously hitting the ball well, would add SO much to the fielding and yet he can't get a spot? It's a bit unfair and continuing to extend the career of Alec Stewart is amazingly short-sighted. It's effectively saying to Foster that despite not letting through a bye in the Australian first innings in Melbourne, he's STILL not good enough.
If the ball is swinging for us, Hoggard may finally have a chace to prove his worth.Eclipse said:Dident u see Im supprised Lee did not take 3 or 4 wickets in that spell at one stage he beat the bat 8 times in two overs.
The big thing for Lee is now to come back from that spell when the ball wont be swinging.