Also another batsman.Useful but without Thakur then we scored 120.
He's doing nothing with bat either. Shambolic situation hereWe can only play 4 bowlers if Ashwin replaces Jadeja. Otherwise it weakens the batting too significantly.
...and he duly removes Moeen. Genius from Kohli!"England has four left-handers, so a good match-up for Jadeja, with our seamers bowling over the wicket." - Panauti
In place of who?Also another batsman.
Yeah fully agree, this situation is not our bowlers doing.You guys are being too harsh here. England won a very important toss, bowled very well and our batsmen played a few soft shots to get out. They are also batting in the best batting conditions and we have done well to get them 220/7. It all depends on our 3rd innings batting. We will most likely bat in very good batting conditions. Gotta hope the middle order finally turn up or that Rohit finally goes on with a start for a big score. We make 300 or 350+ and we will still be the favorites going into the 4th innings, notwithstanding what Woakes and Buttler did last year.
Drop Jadeja, Rahane and a seamer not named Bumrah. Add Ashwin and two batsmen.In place of who?
Is filth.Yeah fully agree, this situation is not our bowlers doing.
Our batting was filth.
Where do you come up with this?Pleased we've got a lead because at 62/5 that looked far from a given, but we really need more than this to make it worth voluntarily choosing to bat 4th at The Oval.
I'd reckon any chase of more than 150 falls into the "decidedly ticklish" category.
Coz what you do when the batting is filth is replace the filth, not add to the filth.How is it that everyone agrees that it's the batting that's filth but the solution is more bowling
Coz what you do when the batting is filth is replace the filth, not add to the filth.
Solution is to change the batsmen, not more bowling. I don't necessarily agree with going to four bowlers to bolster the batting in addition to that, but I wouldn't hate it as long as Ashwin plays.How is it that everyone agrees that it's the batting that's filth but the solution is more bowling?
Feels like I am living in bizarro world.
Yes - or at least consider that this is something one could do.Coz what you do when the batting is filth is replace the filth, not add to the filth.