honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Nah, we just don't have enough batsmen to do that.
Need to do both.
Nah, we just don't have enough batsmen to do that.
Need to do both.
The bowling makes up for the batting - all the pacers have taken important wickets this series. And also, there is no evidence that any of the new batsmen will out bat Jadeja.Need to do both.
This is true but more of a problem with squad selection and abandoning all FC cricket last year.It's a big country. Keep trying people.
Then they shouldn't be here. If they are here, they need a shot to make sure they can't, so you don't pick them again.The bowling makes up for the batting - all the pacers have taken important wickets this series. And also, there is no evidence that any of the new batsmen will out bat Jadeja.
TBF they did not have much choice given the volume of our FC competitions.abandoning all FC cricket last year.
Yes agreed most of them shouldn't be here.Then they shouldn't be here. If they are here, they need a shot to make sure they can't, so you don't pick them again.
Yeah, I would agree with 60-40 England at this stage.My simpleton view about all this is that England won the first two sessions yesterday, we won the last session and the first session today, England have taken this one. Neither team have won sessions by such a big margin that the other needs to win multiple sessions to get back into the game. If we come back post tea and get three good balls in the first half hour and then bat out the day, we still finish the day slightly ahead of the game IMO.
Right now, I would say it is 60-40 England but it does not take a lot to bring it back to 50-50.
Robinson's not done much with the bat since his debut innings. I think he averages single figures since then, so it's all down to these two really. And I have no idea what Moeen was trying to achieve. The only comforting thought about our second innings chase is that Root's due another daddy hundred.Man they still have Woakes, Robinson and the ogre. Not to mention Pope still batting beautifully.
Hope we somehow restrict this to 50 odd runs.
I think people are struggling to find a way to improve the batting and Ashwin isn’t a tailender. For example, If you can improve the bowling you are closing the gap between the two sides if the batting gets no worse at the same time.How is it that everyone agrees that it's the batting that's filth but the solution is more bowling?
Feels like I am living in bizarro world.
This is crazy. England cut through our batting like a knife, time and time again.Yeah, I would agree with 60-40 England at this stage.
Yes, this. It just feels unlikely that someone like Vihari or Agarwal or Shaw or SKY would have got runs in that first innings.I think people are struggling to find a way to improve the batting and Ashwin isn’t a tailender. For example, If you can improve the bowling you are closing the gap between the two sides if the batting gets no worse at the same time.
You've seen our batting, right? There's been one successful chase of 150+ at The Oval this century (2008 v RSA) and we had the services of Strauss, Cook, Bell, Pietersen, Collingwood, Flintoff et al to call on then.Where do you come up with this?
Haha, no - I meant your phrasing.You've seen our batting, right? There's been one successful chase of 150+ at The Oval this century (2008 v RSA) and we had the services of Strauss, Cook, Bell, Pietersen, Collingwood, Flintoff et al to call on then.