Bahnz
Hall of Fame Member
Not become a significantly diminished bowler in the back end of his career.What more does Bumrah needs to achieve to be considered the GREATEST TEST BOWLER EVER?
Not become a significantly diminished bowler in the back end of his career.What more does Bumrah needs to achieve to be considered the GREATEST TEST BOWLER EVER?
Aus made 231/2 easily in 2013. A terrible west indies side made 282 in the 4th innings in 2015. Aus made 263/4 on day 5 in 2017. Aus made 261 in 2018.What makes you think that we can chase 250+ in MCG in 4th innings, when no team has done it for last 60 years ?
Agree. The effective two no11s putting value on their wicketPretty happy here with this. Hopefully they’ll bat for a while tomorrow.
Perhaps not because people generally take more test wickets today, for some reason. I will put Bumrah in top 5 of all time, if he gets to 350 with an average of ~22.5 or underWhat if he ends up with the same number of wickets as Marshall but at a better average? Will that make him the GREATEST EVER?
This. Needs to time his retirement correctly, irrespective of whether he becomes the "greatest fast bowler ever" or not.Not become a significantly diminished bowler in the back end of his career.
Let me guess you want him to retire the minute he starts to decline so that this average looks prettyThis. Needs to time his retirement correctly, irrespective of whether he becomes the "greatest fast bowler ever" or not.
Yes 250 wickets@19 is better than 500 wickets@20 IMOLet me guess you want him to retire the minute he starts to decline so that this average looks pretty
I think writing 'GREATEST EVER' in capital letters all the time definitely doesn't make him one of the greatest ever.What if he ends up with the same number of wickets as Marshall but at a better average? Will that make him the GREATEST EVER?
It doesn't hurt but.I think writing 'GREATEST EVER' in capital letters all the time definitely doesn't make him one of the greatest ever.
Creates butthurt.It doesn't hurt but.
Why would you give India a 20%+ chance of winning (they're 6.4 now) when you have a chance to decrease that?If Australia bat on tomorrow they'll roll the pitch and then roll it again before India bat. Isn't it better for Australia if they declare overnight so pitch is only rolled once?
Genuine question, not sure how much difference it will make on this pitch?
Saying the pitch is flat as is literally contrary to nearly every over bowled by a quick on day four.Because this pitch is flat as, Stark looked less than comfortable in the first innings, and there's nothing there for the spinners.
Don't get me wrong chasing 250 would be very difficult, and India would probably be slight underdogs. But it's incomparable to chasing 150 at wankhede on a rank turner.
I'm not saying it won't be flat tomorrow - entirely possible that India were able to extract something passing on the day - but it absolutely wasn't for most of today. Some of the balls moved viciously off the seam and the bounce wasn't especially consistent.Because this pitch is flat as, Stark looked less than comfortable in the first innings, and there's nothing there for the spinners.
Don't get me wrong chasing 250 would be very difficult, and India would probably be slight underdogs. But it's incomparable to chasing 150 at wankhede on a rank turner.