Bowl line and length mostly, which these 4 could equally be doing if they hadn’t decided/been instructed not to after lunchEveryone missing Wagner-meme attack, but we have also relied heavily in these situations on Colin De Grandhomme to magic up a wicket doing whatever that thing it is that he does.
Yeah you're never going to know ahead of time who you wish you'd left out.... this match it would be Jamieson. Took key wickets last match though.Tbh, Boult’s looked the best of the bowlers for NZ in this game. Should have 2 or 3 to his name if his fielders would back him up.
Yeah, absolutely. Mitchell obviously isn't on the same level bowling-wise, but I wonder if he might be worth a try in case he can turn his batting heroics into a golden arm.Everyone missing Wagner-meme attack, but we have also relied heavily in these situations on Colin De Grandhomme to magic up a wicket doing whatever that thing it is that he does.
Showed the replay just before and Jamieson could absolutely have got hands to that if he'd run without stopping - might've needed a dive still but think quite catchable.Surely Jamieson could have got to that? Need to see a replay.
can't believe they haven't tried any of the c Blundell b *ell yetYeah, absolutely. Mitchell obviously isn't on the same level bowling-wise, but I wonder if he might be worth a try in case he can turn his batting heroics into a golden arm.
By the accounts of the Kiwi posters here, Bracewell is a hideous bowler of spin. Could've made for a good contest.Bracewell not having a bowl at Pope is properly poor captaincy. Hideous player of spin.
That's exactly what this test match needs. Low quality cricket is always the best cricketBy the accounts of the Kiwi posters here, Bracewell is a hideous bowler of spin. Could've made for a good contest.
we all enjoy the stoppable force vs movable objectBy the accounts of the Kiwi posters here, Bracewell is a hideous bowler of spin. Could've made for a good contest.
I don't know why Mitchell barely bowls for NZ - he looks quite handy as a fifth bowler to me and has a reasonable FC record.Yeah, absolutely. Mitchell obviously isn't on the same level bowling-wise, but I wonder if he might be worth a try in case he can turn his batting heroics into a golden arm.
All the discussion about what's missing from our bowling attack (that we had not so long ago) and maybe Latham's captaincy is valid, but still can't help but think consideration #1 is we didn't take catches yesterday. Fundamentally a wicket that's nice to bat on, chances are rare and require a lot of toil to earn... and we butchered two of our first three.Pretty questionable bowling effort so far, obviously the pitch is full of runs but an attack as accomplished as this needs to find ways of tightening things when things aren’t in its favour.