Rcieved an amusing email from a Spurs fan today:
"an FA spokesman after the game absolved the linesman of any responsibility for the apparently mistaken decision not to award a goal to Spurs after a shot from the halfway line crossed the goal line by at least a meter.
"The shot came in from an unusual distance and as such caught the linesman out of position forcing him to race back towards the goal as the play developed", explained the spokesman, "As he ran, the United scarf he was wearing under his shirt came loose and fluttered up into his face obscuring his view and preventing him from making the call. It was just one of those things."
In response to further questions from the Press the spokesman explained "If they don't already have a United tattoo most officials on game day try to wear a scarf or a replica shirt under their regulation kit to show their support for the worlds greatest club. The linesman in this case had chosen to wear a United scarf, a common choice that is in keeping with FA guidelines. The root cause of the problem lies not with the linesman but with the players and management of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club who broke one the most important unwritten rules of the English FA: They placed a shot on target at Old Trafford. Martin Jol is new to this country and perhaps he is not yet familiar with some of our finer traditions. Fortunately if he doesn't yet understand that for the greater good of the game visiting teams, by tradition, are not expected to try to score at Old Trafford then our officials are in a position to help Mr Jol make that cultural adjustment."
Chuckling to himself the FA spokesman added "The goal had to be disallowed to avoid us descending down a slippery slope that would be bad for the
national game. It's a fine line the officials have to walk. If they award a goal this week, next week someone might expect a penalty or ask that Van Nistleroy be booked for diving. Can you imagine? That would just never do.
No no no. Shocking, just the thought of it."
This e-mail and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may contain legally
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, please telephone or e-mail us immediately, delete this
message from your system and do not read, copy, distribute, disclose
or otherwise use this e-mail message and any attachments. Although Heath
Lambert believes this e-mail and any attachments to be free of any
virus or other defect that may affect your computer, it is the responsibility
of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and Heath Lambert does not
accept any responsibility for any loss or damage arising in any way from its
use. Finally, you should be aware that Heath Lambert reserves the right
and intends to intercept and monitor incoming and outgoing e-mail
correspondence, so you should not expect any e-mail communications to
be private in nature.
The picture that was attached:
