Simon
Request Your Custom Title Now!
i rate him higher than Bowen, if Bowen is the fullback im supporting new south wales...Mister Wright said:He might have saved one try, but he let in 2 others. He is crap mate, you can't seriously rate him.
i rate him higher than Bowen, if Bowen is the fullback im supporting new south wales...Mister Wright said:He might have saved one try, but he let in 2 others. He is crap mate, you can't seriously rate him.
I'll hold you to thatbroncoman said:i rate him higher than Bowen, if Bowen is the fullback im supporting new south wales...
wayne bennett learns from his mistakes and besides we will only have 5 or 6 players in origin this season, so we wont be as effected as much...username1234 said:the broncos always end up screwing up at the end of the season. so dont get over excited
not a chance lol, i think its pretty safe to say Wesser will be fullback...vic_orthdox said:I'll hold you to that
First person (bar me) I`ve heard say that! Go the Raiders.broncoman said:not a chance lol, i think its pretty safe to say Wesser will be fullback...
my personal preference for qld fullbacks would go
1 Schifcofske (when fit)
2 Slater
3 Wesser
4 Hunt
5 Bowen
Shifcofske is easily the best Qld fullback in the league, if not the best of all the fullbacks in the competition. I still think Hodges could be a good fullback, but he won't displace Hunt anytime soon.broncoman said:not a chance lol, i think its pretty safe to say Wesser will be fullback...
my personal preference for qld fullbacks would go
1 Schifcofske (when fit)
2 Slater
3 Wesser
4 Hunt
5 Bowen
Tim said:Brett Finch must be the biggest ****** in rugby league. He's always throwing his toys out of the cot.
broncoman said:warriors lost because they werent good enough, neither side will make the 8 on that showing, Hayne was ordinary, but not as poor as mander was in the sharks vs raiders game...
If they had good enough talent they wouldn't be losing games by such small margins. It isn't like the Roosters are the 'gun' team of the competition. The Warriors were at home, they should have won that game.Blaze said:Lol you keep on saying that but they have yet to be thrashed and have lost 4 games by less than a try. I know that that makes them chokers but still the talent is there.
I konw what you mean though, heaps of errors but some good D
Mister Wright said:If they had good enough talent they wouldn't be losing games by such small margins. It isn't like the Roosters are the 'gun' team of the competition. The Warriors were at home, they should have won that game.
lord_of_darkness said:^ and the determination to win i guess.. if they really had the will they could have beat the roosters.. but they always seem 1 step behind.
If you have no talented players you can't win games - look at the Rabitohs. Having enough talented players and the classy (which is a higher class of talented players) players win you the close games.Blaze said:Talent has nothing to do with winning close games. A brain wins you close games and the Warriors lack the brains