Q12 Is it a batting record ? YesSJS said:Is it a batting record ?
Is the record dubious in nature ?
Q13 Is the record dubious in nature ? No, most certainly not!
Q12 Is it a batting record ? YesSJS said:Is it a batting record ?
Is the record dubious in nature ?
That's the only anomaly I can spot in their records..JASON said:Q11 First two test 50s were hundreds ? No
I thought Jason's wink to my Manjrekars was an agreeing one...SJS said:The two Nawabs ?
Q14 I cannot figure this out Mate, but it certainly is nowhere near the answer !membersstand said:hundredsx2+1 = fifties
Well It was about the only formula I could apply to both ManjrekarsJASON said:Q14 I cannot figure this out Mate, but it certainly is nowhere near the answer !
Q15 Were they the two Nawabs ? Yes . Well done SJS. Now what's the record (of sorts) ?SJS said:The two Nawabs ?
Sorry Mate. I put a blink sign next which meant I was puzzled about the choice and not a wink (smiley -which is this - )membersstand said:I thought Jason's wink to my Manjrekars was an agreeing one...
Clarification Jason ?
JASON said:Q15 Were they the two Nawabs ? Yes . Well done SJS. Now what's the record (of sorts) ?
Sorry Mate. I put a blink sign next which meant I was puzzled about the choice and not a wink (smiley -which is this - )
Yesss. You have it !!membersstand said:Wisden Cricketer Of The Year ?
They both scored Century against Australia in their first Test against Australia !! Which definitely should qualify as a record !!SJS said:They had lots of things in common.
I can just try.
They both led India.
They bothscored hundreds in the university match
Both led cambridge (or was it oxford)
Both played county cricket.
Both scored hundreds against Australia.I dont think any of these should qualify