SpaceMonkey
International Debutant
Michael Vaughan did that vs Australia i think, ducked but left his bat up like a periscope and he literally middled the ball and it FLEW through the slips for 4...classic stroke
And yet he continually proves that wrong by going out and scoring runs as an opener, yet he ignores that himself!:wow:marc71178 said:Perhaps it's because he far better at number 3?
And even regarding temperament, ODI and Test cricket are different games and success or failure in one shouldn't denote any judgement on the other.Except to look at his ODI record which doesn't suggest he possesses the temprament for Test Cricket.
Where were you at before you came to the Uni?Neil Pickup said:Our Under 15s
Continually scoring far fewer runs than when he bats at 3...Richard said:And yet he continually proves that wrong by going out and scoring runs as an opener, yet he ignores that himself!:wow:
You reckon?Richard said:And even regarding temperament, ODI and Test cricket are different games and success or failure in one shouldn't denote any judgement on the other.
Yes, he would average about 85 m.p.h., I would think. But it doesn't matter, he chucks. :Piamdavid said:When Brett Lee was playing Under 15's he was bowling to the Australian team as a net bowler , Allan Border said he first saw Brett in 1993/94 & even at 15 he was that quick it was scary.
I mix it up a bit, mainly by design, but often by accidenthalsey said:Are you a flighted bowler, or a flat Kumble bowler? I am pretty flighted, and people always tell me I bowl like Warne (my action)
Neil Pickup said:but often by accident
And who were those? Ian Botham?marc71178 said:You reckon?
How come Collingwood was tipped to have the temprement to be a quality Test Batsman after his ODI performances?
Because some people don't realise this.marc71178 said:How come Collingwood was tipped to have the temprement to be a quality Test Batsman after his ODI performances?
Since 2001 he has averaged 38 opening in Test-cricket, 44 at three.marc71178 said:Continually scoring far fewer runs than when he bats at 3...
But we do have evidence that he performed extremely well on both his first 2 games in very difficult conditions.Richard said:So far we have no evidence whatsoever that Collingwood is a Test-class player.
Yet again no names, why am I not surprised?Richard said:There are still plenty of players I'd prefer see in the side ahead of him presently.
That's a new one, let's snip out a lot of his career when he didn't do so well when opening in order to try and justify your case - never seen you do that with Butcher before.Richard said:Since 2001 he has averaged 38 opening in Test-cricket, 44 at three.
Still better at three, but the innings ratio is 9 to 51.
He also averaged well in 1998 when opening, and has averaged well (40+) almost non-stop for Surrey when opening.
DAMN FREAKIN` RIGHT!!hourn said:And I reckon Beau Casson is the best spin bowling talent in the land.
Keep quoting that stat all you like, it won't increase it's value.marc71178 said:That's a new one, let's snip out a lot of his career when he didn't do so well when opening in order to try and justify your case - never seen you do that with Butcher before.
Over their careers there is a difference in total of 27 less runs per innings batting the way you think they should bat compared with the way they currently do.
Over a match that equates to 54 runs, quite a lot to give up that.
I'd much prefer see all three of those, yes. Sadly one isn't available.marc71178 said:But we do have evidence that he performed extremely well on both his first 2 games in very difficult conditions.
Yet again no names, why am I not surprised?
I bet you'll nbow list Ramprakash, Jones, Lehmann, etc.
Until they continue to bat in those positions and continue to perform better that is...Richard said:Keep quoting that stat all you like, it won't increase it's value.
So what does that tell you then?Richard said:Anyone with any sense can see that Butcher is a different player in the 2001-2004 period than he was in most of the 1997-early-2000 period. In that period he was primarily opening.
Which you seem happy to do when it suits, but not for others to do if it makes your theories look bunkum.Richard said:Let's not snip out any parts of any career - let's remember which parts were different from which others.
You do?Richard said:And yet again you're mixing yourself up - I don't try and justify my case with the facts, I base my case on the facts.
Jones bats at 7 for Kent - how on earth can you justify selecting someone who bats that low down as a specialist batsman?Richard said:I'd much prefer see all three of those, yes. Sadly one isn't available.
You almost had a point there, but again you brought in a failure (unless charging down the wicket and getting stupidly stumped when you team is trying to save a match is proving he can do what's required in Test Cricket - I don't remember Collingwood doing that when he was asked to save matches)Richard said:Hence I would prefer to see Butcher, Hussain, Thorpe and Crawley in ahead of him, all of whom have proven they can. Ramprakash too has.
But yet again neglect to name them...Richard said:I also think there are better players who haven't yet had the opportunity to try.