centurymaker
Cricketer Of The Year
It doesn't.Like does WI, Pak and Bang average really matters??
It doesn't.Like does WI, Pak and Bang average really matters??
Your next post might be your last post.Like does WI, Pak and Bang average really matters??
Pak somewhatIt doesn't.
Bangladesh is the cricket SwargYour next post might be your last post.
So, be wise in choosing your words
Have decent bowlers but too big roads to matter really.Pak somewhat
None of it really matters, but WI have a good attack now and have always produced some minefields from time to time, so it would definitely be creditable if a batsman did well on one of those.Like does WI, Pak and Bang average really matters??
Good point about his overseas record which we tend to over glorify.For eg, one sub par series in South Africa and his avg there would end up mid 30s. He has only played 4 tests in NZ, 6 in SA, 5 in SL, 3 in Pak, 2 in WI. Look at that sample size. It's nothing. Actually none of these country averages can be taken seriously atm. He needs to have played at least 8-10 tests in 'some' of these nations.
Despite two hundreds, Smith's avg fell more than 1 whole point in the BGT as he avg'd just 34 in the series. So if even with hundreds, it's going down like this, a couple of bad series and it could come down very quickly. Thats how fickle averages are. Look at Kohli, dude is going to end up 'below 45', which would be more shocking than Smith finishing on like 51.5Wait for 2/3 years. We may witness the victory of Dravid.
Yeah but his overseas record often gets presented as Tendulkar-esque whereas the reality is most countries it's fairly small samples.he averages 55 in England and 50 in Ind, he's fine
Smith ending up there takes away a lot from him, not gonna lie.Despite two hundreds, Smith's avg fell more than 1 whole point in the BGT as he avg'd just 34 in the series. So if even with hundreds, it's going down like this, a couple of bad series and it could come down very quickly. Thats how fickle averages are. Look at Kohli, dude is going to end up 'below 45', which would be more shocking than Smith finishing on like 51.5
Definitely reflexes helped cover up this issue in his peak.The idea that it's just bounce that has saved Smith this whole time and he would have struggled if he had just happened to ever face good fast bowling on lower bouncing pitches is a complete fantasy. Total fabrication.
The bounce had ****all to do with it ffs, Smith just misses the straighter ones now, and in his peak he flat out never did. Just used to flick them away all day.Definitely reflexes helped cover up this issue in his peak.
Yeah it's almost as if he had a technique which worked well for him in that it made him near impossible to dismiss in all conditions, against virtually all but the most extreme types of bowling, everywhere he played. Your runs don't count extra because you "didn't rely on hand eye coordination as much".Definitely reflexes helped cover up this issue in his peak.
Previously it wasn't bounce, it was his insane reflexes/hand eye. He would never miss anything on his pads. Now it is the bounce that is saving him.The idea that it's just bounce that has saved Smith this whole time and he would have struggled if he had just happened to ever face good fast bowling on lower bouncing pitches is a complete fantasy. Total fabrication.
Yes because of reflexes as I just said.The bounce had ****all to do with it ffs, Smith just misses the straighter ones now, and in his peak he flat out never did. Just used to flick them away all day.