• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Jacques Kallis vs Glenn Mcgrath

Who was the better test cricketer?


  • Total voters
    53

kyear2

International Coach
Nah Kallis was a 3/4th bowler for early career and a 5/6th bowler later career.

Imran I always acknowledged is a 6/7 borderline specialist bat.
The hypocrisy.

But he played wayyyyyyy more as a 4th than any other slot.

And if course then, Imran was a 7 / 8 the majority of his career and a 6 only really late?

Hardly specialists.

And really and truly their outputs are more comparable to each other's than being even close to Sobers's.

But in reality, Kallis was more often a 4th / 3rd than he was a 5th

And conversely Imran was more a 7th / 8th than he was a 6th.

Like the arguments you make, doesn't make sense.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Hobbs
Gavaskar
Bradman
Sachin
Sobers
Gilchrist
Imran
Hadlee
Marshall
McGrath
Muralitharan
Love it tbh. Gets in the top 3 pace bowlers of all time, and Sobers' bowling responsibility is lower which is good because in an ATG context, I think he'd be a weaker 5th option. He'd make a solid emergency backup option here. Batting depth is terrific with Hadlee/Imran both.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
The hypocrisy.

But he played wayyyyyyy more as a 4th than any other slot.

And if course then, Imran was a 7 / 8 the majority of his career and a 6 only really late?

Hardly specialists.

And really and truly their outputs are more comparable to each other's than being even close to Sobers's.

But in reality, Kallis was more often a 4th / 3rd than he was a 5th

And conversely Imran was more a 7th / 8th than he was a 6th.

Like the arguments you make, doesn't make sense.
Imran even without not outs has an output of 30 runs an innings.

Kallis can hardly scratch 1 wicket an innings as a bowler.

And once you remove minnows, Kallis becomes even less test standard whereas Imran actually improves without SL.

Their output is in no way comparable. This is a joke.

Like I said, Imran overall was a 6/7 borderline lower order bat and only was a no.8 in the 70s, basically first 1/3rd of his career.

Kallis only had a 3/4th bowling load in the first 1/3rd of his career and dropped his load as his batting became better.
 
Last edited:

Johan

International Regular
Warne and Murali against another ATG side?

They'd get the same statement Jack Leach got in 2021 Ashes or Graeme Swann in 2013 Ashes, just lottery runs, Murali would retire mid way through the series and Shane would bowl fast medium by the end of the series.
 

Johan

International Regular
My opinion is that it is much easier to score against ATG spinners than ATG fast bowlers.
obviously, Australia and Pakistan handled Murali at his home crafted pitches, so did India to an extent, spinners are just bad batters merchant, someone like Sobers would turn both the ATG spinners into his personal concubines but could never do that to Trueman.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
obviously, Australia and Pakistan handled Murali at his home crafted pitches, so did India to an extent, spinners are just bad batters merchant, someone like Sobers would turn both the ATG spinners into his personal concubines but could never do that to Trueman.
Its simple physics.

As Sidhu pointed out, spinners are normally bound to one good length. Any capable bat with enough footwork, wrists and confidence can counter them as long as the pitch doesn't cause too much deviance.

Whereas a pacer is not bound to one good length and even when he is it's 20MPH faster.
 

Johan

International Regular
I honestly think the two ATG spinners are rated because of their dominance over other spinners bar Tiger, in actual skill and what they bring to the table against good batting lineups, they're just far inferior to a lot of pacers
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I honestly think the two ATG spinners are rated because of their dominance over other spinners bar Tiger, in actual skill and what they bring to the table against good batting lineups, they're just far inferior to a lot of pacers
It takes the match getting into the 4th and 5th day for the spinners to reach pacer level of effectiveness.
 

kyear2

International Coach
I have five batsmen(including Don) and Gilly.
Two bowlers who can bat(avg of 35 & 25).
It is more than enough to win.
Figured people would have figured out from India by now this all rounder stuff doesn't work.

For those of you who lived through the era recall that it was often discussed having Gilly bat at 6, and this was when Australia had what is very arguably the best batting line up ever.

It was largely resisted, because even with a team that strong it wasn't worth the risk and gave the team too long of a tail.

Even in his prestigious career, and on an ATG team, batted at 6, 11 times. At 7 ,75 times.

So even for Australia he was reluctant to bat that high, because again, it weakened the batting.

There's a reason why no one else does it.
 

Top