anil1405
International Captain
Good luck trying to identify those who have already put him in the ATG category in this thread.Quite a few have.
Good luck trying to identify those who have already put him in the ATG category in this thread.Quite a few have.
Quite a few have.
Him not having fifers in SENA is a fact. And yeah, I watched India's series in SA and England that I referred to before, as well as India in Australia and against NZ this year. I have seen Ashwin bowl and I have seen his improvement. But he still has those holes in his record to fill. I was only responding to earlier posters trying to defend him as an ATG bowler based solely on his current record.
W/L ratio of 18. WTF.I think a better comparison would be the WI in the actual 80s. In that decade
IND has W/L ratio of 26 at home in matches involving SIR RAVINDRA JADEJA at home.
Name them dammit. Asked it before too.Quite a few have.
That was my impression when posters pushed back on my claim that his home record alone was insufficient to be an ATG. Also think 1-2 mentioned it in the beginning. But it would be easier to tell if there was a poll.Slow down statsgurushakerz....
Please point out who said he was already an ATG bowler here first, before we waste time debating your nonexistent argument.
Those two names imo, should be swapped. Otherwise yeah, Ashwin is an atg player/spinner. Missing the Murali/Warne level because he wasn't too good away to the good/decent teams of his time: http://howstat.com/cricket/statistics/players/PlayerCountries.asp?PlayerID=3788#bowl
Yeah like post 2015 SENA, I am sure.
You can keep excusing every good performance as a spinning pitch or weak opposition when people who have actually watched the games know it was neither. I mean, if an ATG can be someone who relied on bottle tops and cheating umpires, I feel someone who actually performed and won games at home with neutral umpires and no ball tampering is definitely an ATG. And a better one.
Because he's a bowler who had 'a niggle' everytime he was supposed to play on a pitch that was not suitable for his bowling styleBecause he's not from India and a spinner?
Murali's away average in 28 but he is definitely rated higher than Waqar.Ashwin's away average is 31. Waqar's away average is 25. Waqar is an ATG pacer without any qualifications IMO.
One can be allowed to be biased towards greatest Cricketer from their own State.?Silfer is not Indian so can't be accused of fanboying. HB ... let's just say he gets carried away at times. Don't think he considers Ashwin an ATG yet.
ATG player
You do understand player =/= bowler? Or you need that put up on statsguru too?ATG player
ATG player, not quite ATG bowler yet. Surely not hard to understand?Silfer is not Indian so can't be accused of fanboying. HB ... let's just say he gets carried away at times. Don't think he considers Ashwin an ATG yet.
TIL Lara played for Tamilnadu. And dude, you should be the last one to talk about bias here.One can be allowed to be biased towards greatest Cricketer from their own State.?
There is nothing wrong in being biased. For eg. I am biased against Kohli. Why are you in combative mode ?TIL Lara played for Tamilnadu. And dude, you should be the last one to talk about bias here.