• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Irfan Pathan!

yohanna

Banned
I guess you forgot to read the underlined part. The author is clearly making a hypothetical statement to get some attention.
It got people's attention alright but with some laughter,though one guy took it rather seriously.

I am not defending the article, I am just telling you about your 'Holier than Thou' attitude. Look at the bragging by your pakistani brothers who think that he is the next Glen Mcgrath.
Didn't i earlier (atlest on two occasions) admitted that? are things so difficult for you to get?

As for your link on Nehra & Balaji , It's still one Indian out of 1 Billion.
Yet knowingly very well ,you still demanded that link again and again!
 

warrioryohannan

U19 Cricketer
Sanz said:
Hahaha. Well I think that writer is doing a good job of ****ing our neighbours off. Even though I dont support such adjectives, these things are not new Kapil being called 'Haryana Hurricane' , Waqar - 'Burewala Xpress', shoiab - 'Rawalpindi xpress (all early in their careers).
.
Except that Kapil, Akhter and Waqar were/are World class bowlers, while Khan and especially Pathan aren't class bowlers.

The writer is comming up with comical stuff one after another, such jokers shouldn't be allowed to write article for such a respectable newspaper.,
 

Sanz

Hall of Fame Member
yohanna said:
It got people's attention alright but with some laughter,though one guy took it rather seriously.
Well, you shouldn't have taken him that seriously. I didn't take him seriously, Infact I dont even read Times of India because it's more like a tabloid. If you read a tabloid that's what you will get.

Didn't i earlier (atlest on two occasions) admitted that? are things so difficult for you to get?
If you have already accepted that Pakistanis are as good in Bragging then why single out the Indians.

Yet knowingly very well ,you still demanded that link again and again!
Assumptions again !! I didn't know such a thread existed until I read your post.
 

Sanz

Hall of Fame Member
warrioryohannan said:
The writer is comming up with comical stuff one after another, such jokers shouldn't be allowed to write article for such a respectable newspaper.,
Respectable ? TOI is not respectable, not anymore. One just needs to goto their main page to notice it. Most people I know have given up on TOI long time ago. It's time you should look for other newspapers for news. To start with try Outlook or Hindu.
 

V Reddy

International Debutant
Sanz said:
Well, you shouldn't have taken him that seriously. I didn't take him seriously, Infact I dont even read Times of India because it's more like a tabloid. If you read a tabloid that's what you will get.
Believe it or not , Times of India has now become the World's most read newspaper and its website receives the 5th most traffic among newspapers worldwide:O
 

yohanna

Banned
Sanz said:




If you have already accepted that Pakistanis are as good in Bragging then why single out the Indians.


I never did that, problem is that u are slow in getting simple things.I only negated Visnu's claim that Munaf wasn't hyped up in Indian media.
Assumptions again !! I didn't know such a thread existed until I read your post.
Well, you shouldn't have taken him that seriously. I didn't take him seriously, Infact I dont even read Times of India because it's more like a tabloid. If you read a tabloid that's what you will get.
Seriously :lol: :lol: I read that article for a good laughter, it wasn't me who was saying that except for the headlines the rest of the articlke made sense.
 

Sanz

Hall of Fame Member
yohanna said:
I never did that, problem is that u are slow in getting simple things.
Never ?? I am not sure how you will deny the following

...members of this forum knows very well that noone brags more about their fast bowlers talent than Indians.


Seriously I read that article for a good laughter, it wasn't me who was saying that except for the headlines the rest of the articlke made sense.
I read the article only after you posted it here. I dont think you even read that article, you just stopped after reading the headlines. Next time you want to read real news about India, avoid reading Tabloid Stuff.
 

Craig

World Traveller
Sanz said:
Some ?? I would say most. They just brag about everything, they even consider Shahid Afridi as next Richards :)
Sir Isaac Vivien Alexander Richards would be 50 or in his early 50's? I think he could bat much better then Afridi now. In fact Richards in his prime could of batted left handed and still bat better then Afridi.

That is the funniest thing I have read today.
 

yohanna

Banned
Never ?? I am not sure how you will deny the following ...members of this forum knows very well that noone brags more about their fast bowlers talent than Indians.
So?? didn't i said atleast twice that Pakistani fans brags too? How can you say that i had only single out the Indians.

I read the article only after you posted it here. I dont think you even read that article, you just stopped after reading the headlines. Next time you want to read real news about India, avoid reading Tabloid Stuff.
It doesn't matter WHEN you started reading the artcle. I did read that article completely, i don't need ur suggestions on what papers i have to read. Many here's will disagree with you on the papers being tabloid stuff, interestingly knowingly very well that it was all rusbbish you kept defending it till very last!
 
17 runs of one delivery..

So where are the die hard Pakistani fans now ?? Bouncer,Hellraiser.. etc .

Man Pak bowling is a pile or garbage, even Bangladeh could have done a better job. Sami is probably the worst ever OD bowler and what the hell was Naveed doing? 17 runs of just one delivery...LOL. I was dissapointed with Indian batting a bit, i thought if we had Laxman we would probably had reached 400 total.

I think India was better than Pak in all three department of the game, Batting, bowling and fielding.

Though the game went close coz of Inzi's brillaint effort, the rest of the games would probably won't go closer and i believe India would now win them at ease.

5-0 to India or maybe 4-1 to India, that what the series would go India's way.
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Re: 17 runs of one delivery..

ajaagarkarajaaja said:
Man Pak bowling is a pile or garbage, even Bangladeh could have done a better job.
Rather even India could have done a better job. They were only marginally better after all.
 

harry674

School Boy/Girl Captain
Re: 17 runs of one delivery..

ajaagarkarajaaja said:
So where are the die hard Pakistani fans now ?? Bouncer,Hellraiser.. etc .

Man Pak bowling is a pile or garbage, even Bangladeh could have done a better job. Sami is probably the worst ever OD bowler and what the hell was Naveed doing? 17 runs of just one delivery...LOL. I was dissapointed with Indian batting a bit, i thought if we had Laxman we would probably had reached 400 total.

I think India was better than Pak in all three department of the game, Batting, bowling and fielding.

Though the game went close coz of Inzi's brillaint effort, the rest of the games would probably won't go closer and i believe India would now win them at ease.

5-0 to India or maybe 4-1 to India, that what the series would go India's way.
if probaby schwag was bating for another 30-40 runs or yuvraj would have better then 400+/- was easy.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Re: 17 runs of one delivery..

ajaagarkarajaaja said:
Man Pak bowling is a pile or garbage,
I'd take the pakistani attack over the Indian one any day.

For a start, this is a blip and not in common with their usual efforts.

The same cannot be said of the Indian attack.
 

aussiefan

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Irfan Pathan is a young bowler who has just entered the international arena and what i saw of him in Melbourne i must say that he is a good bowler with capacity to improve.

if grommed well he will be one of the strike bowlers of india
 
Re: Re: 17 runs of one delivery..

marc71178 said:
I'd take the pakistani attack over the Indian one any day.

Seriously, what do you see in that attack?? Except for wides,No-balls , Byes and getting hit for 4 and sixes???

At most Akhter is decent,the rest are all crap.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Re: Re: Re: 17 runs of one delivery..

ajaagarkarajaaja said:
Seriously, what do you see in that attack?? Except for wides,No-balls , Byes and getting hit for 4 and sixes???
A typical kneejerk reaction. One swallow does not a summer make.


ajaagarkarajaaja said:
At most Akhter is decent,the rest are all crap.
Well that gives them one more "decent" player than in the Indian attack then (if that's the definition you wish to give one of the best bowlers in the world) - that aside, the Pakistani attack is considerably better than the Indian one.
 

Top