Daemon
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Still overall tougher though.But conditions don't come as tough if you're born and bred to them. Isn't that the point?
Still overall tougher though.But conditions don't come as tough if you're born and bred to them. Isn't that the point?
Yeah, and I don't think anyone is saying otherwise tbf. It's more subtle than that, which is why a number of folks with rocks in their heads are having trouble coming to terms with it.Still overall tougher though.
We should demerit them for their away fails and merit them for home success. At present it seems we only do that former.No. His style of bowling was more suited to SC rather than Eng or NZ. That’s why context is important. Just because someone succeeds in conditions perceived as tough and fail in the easier doesn’t mean they are better than opposite.
Very good point. Imagine what Gavaskar would average if he hid down the order like Border.He wasn’t a coward like Border whose average is inflated by not outs .
QuiteHe wasn’t a coward like Border whose average is inflated by the bowlers not being able to get him out.
And your IQ drops to 13 after mineSmith averages 49 after my average adjustments
We do get it which is why we don't say those bowlers in SC are automatically better. But the gist we are getting from your side is that it all equalises out in the end and we don't agree with that.Yeah, and I don't think anyone is saying otherwise tbf. It's more subtle than that, which is why a number of folks with rocks in their heads are having trouble coming to terms with it.
Probably 25 in AustraliaVery good point. Imagine what Gavaskar would average if he hid down the order like Border.
Bradman didn't hit a lot of 6s, it is a real question mark . . . yeah it's very poor logicIt's not a question mark, it's a product of what worked for him as he developed as a cricketer. If he'd had the misfortune to be born in Pakistan, he'd have come up on pitches which required him to swing it around. He's a world class sportsman, Do you think he'd have just plodded along doing what didn't work in his own conditions? Come on. It's ridiculous.
Well that's because you lack basic comprehension skills. That's not my fault.We do get it which is why we don't say those bowlers in SC are automatically better. But the gist we are getting from your side is that it all equalises out in the end and we don't agree with that.
If he played for Australia, he wouldn't have had to face Dennis "couldve got gavaskar out with a tomato" Lillee and thus would have averaged 75+Probably 25 in Australia
Well that's because you lack basic comprehension skills. That's not my fault.
.I ran a 10 second 100m the other day on this
View attachment 39728
but I grew up there so it’s basically the same thing as running on a track
Shami, Broad, Wagner.And I think people rate him as 27-28 bowler . Name me few 27-28 avg bowlers who are rated higher than Kapil ?
??? Where did I say that? And Lara and Kallis aren't particularly from the same era. They overlapped but Lara had to deal with much better bowling earlier in his career and Lara also very rarely faced any attacks as dire as Bangladesh, Zimbabwe and WI post 2000.Is Kallis a significantly better batsman than Lara then according to you since surface level average is all that matters.
Agreed, but if you run on this and are unable to run on a simple track, doesn’t mean you should be given some extra pointsI ran a 10 second 100m the other day on this
View attachment 39728
but I grew up there so it’s basically the same thing as running on a track
Pssshhh big deal you just adapted to the lava broI ran a 10 second 100m the other day on this
View attachment 39728
but I grew up there so it’s basically the same thing as running on a track
He’d just adapt since that’s what great players do!Probably 25 in Australia
This is a good point actually.If he played for Australia, he wouldn't have had to face Dennis "couldve got gavaskar out with a tomato" Lillee and thus would have averaged 75+